The Reality of Shareholder Ownership: For-profit Corporations as Slaves

What is the relationship between shareholders and the corporation? The present scholarly consensus is that, whatever the relationship is, it is not one of owner and owned. This article contests that consensus. It argues that corporations are owned by their shareholders and, further, that corporations so-owned are slaves. In support of this contention, the Roman law of slavery is brought to bear as an important point of comparison, with various startling similarities between Roman slaves and for-profit corporations highlighted and drawn upon. The significance of identifying the for-profit corporation as a slave is that it provides a novel explanation for why corporations pathologically maximise profits. Further, by implication, it yields a proposal for addressing this problematic behaviour – that is, that for-profit corporations ought to be freed from their enslavement. The article has three substantive sections. The first discusses corporate personhood; the second corporate ownership; and the third free corporations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53637/yrji4820
Primary Topic
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Reality of Shareholder Ownership: For-profit Corporations as Slaves

Duncan Wallace
University of New South Wales Law Journal
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
article

The Reality of Shareholder Ownership: For-profit Corporations as Slaves

Duncan Wallace
article en

Abstract

What is the relationship between shareholders and the corporation? The present scholarly consensus is that, whatever the relationship is, it is not one of owner and owned. This article contests that consensus. It argues that corporations are owned by their shareholders and, further, that corporations so-owned are slaves. In support of this contention, the Roman law of slavery is brought to bear as an important point of comparison, with various startling similarities between Roman slaves and for-profit corporations highlighted and drawn upon. The significance of identifying the for-profit corporation as a slave is that it provides a novel explanation for why corporations pathologically maximise profits. Further, by implication, it yields a proposal for addressing this problematic behaviour – that is, that for-profit corporations ought to be freed from their enslavement. The article has three substantive sections. The first discusses corporate personhood; the second corporate ownership; and the third free corporations.

University of New South Wales Law JournalVol. 47(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.