Disability Discrimination in Education: Investigating the ADR Experiences of Parents and Practitioners

Disability discrimination in schools is prohibited by state and federal anti-discrimination laws. If issues arise, complainants may seek redress through formal or informal complaint pathways. These pathways often utilise confidential alternative dispute resolution (‘ADR’), and as such, little is known about how the conflict inherent in such complaints is resolved, if at all. Despite this gap, the recent Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability made recommendations to amend these laws without inquiring into how these complaints were resolved or whether the advantages of ADR are realised. This article employs thematic analysis to address this gap by exploring the experiences of two participant groups involved in these confidential education complaints about students with disability-related challenging behaviours: parent participants and resolution practitioners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53637/satc4613
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disability Discrimination in Education: Investigating the ADR Experiences of Parents and Practitioners

Elpitha Peta Lee Spyrou, M. Clausen
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
article

Disability Discrimination in Education: Investigating the ADR Experiences of Parents and Practitioners

Elpitha Peta Lee Spyrou, M. Clausen
article en

Abstract

Disability discrimination in schools is prohibited by state and federal anti-discrimination laws. If issues arise, complainants may seek redress through formal or informal complaint pathways. These pathways often utilise confidential alternative dispute resolution (‘ADR’), and as such, little is known about how the conflict inherent in such complaints is resolved, if at all. Despite this gap, the recent Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability made recommendations to amend these laws without inquiring into how these complaints were resolved or whether the advantages of ADR are realised. This article employs thematic analysis to address this gap by exploring the experiences of two participant groups involved in these confidential education complaints about students with disability-related challenging behaviours: parent participants and resolution practitioners.

University of New South Wales Law JournalVol. 47(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disability Discrimination in Education: Investigating the ADR Experiences of Parents and Practitioners — Elpitha Peta Lee Spyrou, M. Clausen · University of New South Wales Law Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS