A Comparison of Different Transfer Techniques in Evaluating Specimen Adequacy in <scp>FNAB</scp>: An Unexplored Topic

Both techniques showed similar nondiagnostic rates. Technique 1 resulted in a slight increase in the average positive cell count, whereas Technique 2 may be preferred due to its simplicity and safety. It was also found that neither technique provided a clear superiority over the other, and using both techniques together was not superior to either Technique 1 or Technique 2. In determining standard FNAB procedures and improving diagnostic accuracy, factors such as nodule characteristics and needle caliber, along with smear techniques, should also be considered. Larger-scale studies are necessary to validate these findings and improve FNAB practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25458
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Different Transfer Techniques in Evaluating Specimen Adequacy in FNAB: An Unexplored Topic

Fatma Zeynep Arslan, Burcu Özcan, Arzu Gedik
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

A Comparison of Different Transfer Techniques in Evaluating Specimen Adequacy in FNAB: An Unexplored Topic

Fatma Zeynep Arslan, Burcu Özcan, Arzu Gedik
article en

Abstract

Both techniques showed similar nondiagnostic rates. Technique 1 resulted in a slight increase in the average positive cell count, whereas Technique 2 may be preferred due to its simplicity and safety. It was also found that neither technique provided a clear superiority over the other, and using both techniques together was not superior to either Technique 1 or Technique 2. In determining standard FNAB procedures and improving diagnostic accuracy, factors such as nodule characteristics and needle caliber, along with smear techniques, should also be considered. Larger-scale studies are necessary to validate these findings and improve FNAB practices.

Diagnostic CytopathologyVol. 53(5)
Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (TR), Istanbul Eye Hospital (TR), İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison of Different Transfer Techniques in Evaluating Specimen Adequacy in <scp>FNAB</scp>: An Unexplored Topic — Fatma Zeynep Arslan, Burcu Özcan, et al. · Diagnostic Cytopathology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS