Proportionate Liability for Breach of Trust under the Civil Liability Act: An Opiate on the Conscience of Trustees

This article considers the impact that part 4 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) may have on the internal workings of the office of trusteeship. It is argued that where more than one trustee has been involved in an imprudent breach of trust that has caused loss, the claims are likely to be apportionable under part 4, with the effect that the trustees are no longer jointly and severally liable for the loss, each being liable severally only, and each liable only for the proportion of the loss for which they are responsible. It is suggested that this conclusion indicates the potential for the statutory regime to operate as something of an opiate on the conscience of trustees, undermining the incentive structures that equitable doctrine traditionally deployed to keep trustees up to their duty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53637/iezr3427
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportionate Liability for Breach of Trust under the Civil Liability Act: An Opiate on the Conscience of Trustees

Matthew Conaglen
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Legal principles and applications
article

Proportionate Liability for Breach of Trust under the Civil Liability Act: An Opiate on the Conscience of Trustees

Matthew Conaglen
article en

Abstract

This article considers the impact that part 4 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) may have on the internal workings of the office of trusteeship. It is argued that where more than one trustee has been involved in an imprudent breach of trust that has caused loss, the claims are likely to be apportionable under part 4, with the effect that the trustees are no longer jointly and severally liable for the loss, each being liable severally only, and each liable only for the proportion of the loss for which they are responsible. It is suggested that this conclusion indicates the potential for the statutory regime to operate as something of an opiate on the conscience of trustees, undermining the incentive structures that equitable doctrine traditionally deployed to keep trustees up to their duty.

University of New South Wales Law JournalVol. 47(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.