Simple and accurate method to evaluate type a standard and expanded uncertainties of measurement for the Laplace distributed observations

The article proposes and investigates a simple and accurate evaluation of the standard and expanded uncertainty of the Laplace population median. With the number of observations n, the known probability distribution describing the sample median for n-2 observations was used to approximate the uncertainty of the population median. The proposed approximation was tested by comparison with exact results for n ≤ 10 and with the Monte Carlo method. It has been shown that the standard and expanded (confidence level p = 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99) uncertainties determined by the proposed approximation differ from values determined by MCM by less than about 1%. Using the median instead of the mean value as the measurement result provides a measurement uncertainty lower by about 25% when n ≥ 35, and over 29% when n ≥ 70.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrology and Measurement Systems
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2024.152049
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simple and accurate method to evaluate type a standard and expanded uncertainties of measurement for the Laplace distributed observations

M. Dorozhovets
Metrology and Measurement Systems
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Simple and accurate method to evaluate type a standard and expanded uncertainties of measurement for the Laplace distributed observations

M. Dorozhovets
article en

Abstract

The article proposes and investigates a simple and accurate evaluation of the standard and expanded uncertainty of the Laplace population median. With the number of observations n, the known probability distribution describing the sample median for n-2 observations was used to approximate the uncertainty of the population median. The proposed approximation was tested by comparison with exact results for n ≤ 10 and with the Monte Carlo method. It has been shown that the standard and expanded (confidence level p = 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99) uncertainties determined by the proposed approximation differ from values determined by MCM by less than about 1%. Using the median instead of the mean value as the measurement result provides a measurement uncertainty lower by about 25% when n ≥ 35, and over 29% when n ≥ 70.

Metrology and Measurement Systems
Rzeszów University of Technology (PL), Lviv Polytechnic National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.