Digital infrastructure and the cost of debt: evidence from “BroadBand China” policy

Purpose This paper explores the linkage of digital infrastructure to the cost of debt. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the implementation of the “Broadband China” policy that improves digital infrastructure as an exogenous shock and exploits the difference-in-differences method (DID). Findings Empirical analyses show that digital infrastructure leads to increased firms’ borrowing costs, which is robust to several robustness checks. In addition, we find that this unfavourable effect can be attributed to intensified market competition led by digital infrastructure construction. Cross-sectional analysis shows that this effect is greater for non-SOEs and smaller firms. Finally, we offer additional evidence of the unfavourable effect by showing that digital infrastructure construction leads to decreased fundamentals. Originality/value Our paper unveils how digital infrastructure construction affects firms’ business strategy in using private debts and extends the determinants of firms’ borrowing costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Finance Review International
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-10-2024-0626
Citations
7
Primary Topic
ICT Impact and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital infrastructure and the cost of debt: evidence from “BroadBand China” policy

Yan Jiang, Dayong Lv, Suyu Hao, Xiaokun Wei et al.
7 citations
China Finance Review International
ICT Impact and Policies
7.95
article

Digital infrastructure and the cost of debt: evidence from “BroadBand China” policy

Yan Jiang, Dayong Lv, Suyu Hao, Xiaokun Wei, Youyi Wu
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper explores the linkage of digital infrastructure to the cost of debt. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the implementation of the “Broadband China” policy that improves digital infrastructure as an exogenous shock and exploits the difference-in-differences method (DID). Findings Empirical analyses show that digital infrastructure leads to increased firms’ borrowing costs, which is robust to several robustness checks. In addition, we find that this unfavourable effect can be attributed to intensified market competition led by digital infrastructure construction. Cross-sectional analysis shows that this effect is greater for non-SOEs and smaller firms. Finally, we offer additional evidence of the unfavourable effect by showing that digital infrastructure construction leads to decreased fundamentals. Originality/value Our paper unveils how digital infrastructure construction affects firms’ business strategy in using private debts and extends the determinants of firms’ borrowing costs.

China Finance Review InternationalVol. 16(1)
Tongji University (CN), Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance (CN), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Booth University College (CA), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
ICT Impact and Policies
7.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.