Publishers' Response to Post‐Publication Concerns About Clinical Research in Women's Health

The current PPR process is inefficient and ineffective in assessing and removing untrustworthy data from the medical literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18100
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publishers' Response to Post‐Publication Concerns About Clinical Research in Women's Health

Jim Thornton, Lyle C. Gurrin, Jeremy Nielsen, Ben W. Mol et al.
8 citations
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Academic integrity and plagiarism
18.93
article

Publishers' Response to Post‐Publication Concerns About Clinical Research in Women's Health

Jim Thornton, Lyle C. Gurrin, Jeremy Nielsen, Ben W. Mol, Siddharth Shivantha, Nicole Au
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The current PPR process is inefficient and ineffective in assessing and removing untrustworthy data from the medical literature.

BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyVol. 132(7)
University of Nottingham (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), Monash University (AU)
Monash University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
18.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.