Unlocking Subsurface Geology: A Case Study with Measure-While-Drilling Data and Machine Learning

Bench-scale geological modeling is often uncertain due to limited exploration drilling and geophysical wireline measurements, reducing production efficiency. Measure-While-Drilling (MWD) systems collect drilling data to analyze mining blast hole drill rig performance. Early MWD studies focused on penetration rates to identify rock types. This paper investigates Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based regression models to predict geophysical signatures like density, gamma, magnetic susceptibility, resistivity, and hole diameter using MWD data. The machine learning (ML) models evaluated include Linear Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DTs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Random Forests (RFs), Gaussian Processes (GP), and Neural Networks (NNs). An analytical method was validated for accuracy, and a three-tier experimental method assessed the importance of MWD features, revealing no performance loss when excluding features with less than 2% importance. RF, DTs, and GPs outperformed other models, achieving R2 values up to 0.98 with a low RMSE, while LR and SVMs showed lower accuracy. The NN’s performance improved with larger datasets. This study concludes that the DT, RF, and GP models excel in predicting geophysical signatures. While ML-based methods effectively model relationships in the data, their predictive performance remains inherently constrained by the underlying geological and physical mechanisms. Model selection depends on computational resources and application needs, offering valuable insights for real-time orebody analysis using AI. These findings could be invaluable to geologists who wish to utilize AI techniques for real-time orebody analysis and prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030241
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking Subsurface Geology: A Case Study with Measure-While-Drilling Data and Machine Learning

Chris Aldrich, Quanxi Shao, Louisa O’Connor, Daniel Goldstein
4 citations
Minerals
Drilling and Well Engineering
4.58
article

Unlocking Subsurface Geology: A Case Study with Measure-While-Drilling Data and Machine Learning

Chris Aldrich, Quanxi Shao, Louisa O’Connor, Daniel Goldstein
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Bench-scale geological modeling is often uncertain due to limited exploration drilling and geophysical wireline measurements, reducing production efficiency. Measure-While-Drilling (MWD) systems collect drilling data to analyze mining blast hole drill rig performance. Early MWD studies focused on penetration rates to identify rock types. This paper investigates Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based regression models to predict geophysical signatures like density, gamma, magnetic susceptibility, resistivity, and hole diameter using MWD data. The machine learning (ML) models evaluated include Linear Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DTs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Random Forests (RFs), Gaussian Processes (GP), and Neural Networks (NNs). An analytical method was validated for accuracy, and a three-tier experimental method assessed the importance of MWD features, revealing no performance loss when excluding features with less than 2% importance. RF, DTs, and GPs outperformed other models, achieving R2 values up to 0.98 with a low RMSE, while LR and SVMs showed lower accuracy. The NN’s performance improved with larger datasets. This study concludes that the DT, RF, and GP models excel in predicting geophysical signatures. While ML-based methods effectively model relationships in the data, their predictive performance remains inherently constrained by the underlying geological and physical mechanisms. Model selection depends on computational resources and application needs, offering valuable insights for real-time orebody analysis using AI. These findings could be invaluable to geologists who wish to utilize AI techniques for real-time orebody analysis and prediction.

MineralsVol. 15(3)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Curtin University (AU), Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines (Australia) (AU), Data61 (AU)
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Curtin University of Technology, Minerals Research Institute of Western Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Drilling and Well Engineering
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.