Primary Motives and Barriers to Physical Activity Participation Among Students Registered at a Semi-Rural University: A Mixed-Methods Study

Physical inactivity among university students remains a global health concern, especially in semi-rural settings where unique barriers such as limited facilities, cultural norms, and inadequate transportation persist. This study aimed to identify the primary motivations and barriers to physical activity participation among students at a semi-rural university, providing insights for tailored interventions. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was used. In the quantitative phase, 414 questionnaires were distributed across four faculties, with 328 completed responses analysed using <i>t</i>-tests and factor analysis. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 23 students, analysed through conventional content analysis. The quantitative findings revealed key motivators for physical activity, which included enjoyment (mean = 4.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001), social interaction (mean = 3.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and health benefits (mean = 3.27, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, for barriers, heavy academic workload reached statistical significance (mean = 3.88, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast, qualitative data uncovered additional barriers such as insufficient facilities and poor communication, which were not captured in the quantitative phase. Factor analysis identified four constructs for motivations (e.g., coaching, social, health, enjoyment) and barriers (e.g., club processes, excuses, external factors, lack of interest). Qualitative data corroborated these findings, highlighting issues such as insufficient visibility of physical activity programs, time barriers, and inconsistent coaching quality. This study underscores the importance of addressing structural barriers, such as upgrading facilities, improving communication strategies, and enhancing coaching quality, to increase physical activity participation. By implementing strategic interventions, universities can foster inclusive environments that better support students' well-being and engagement, ultimately promoting healthier lifestyles among university populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22030344
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary Motives and Barriers to Physical Activity Participation Among Students Registered at a Semi-Rural University: A Mixed-Methods Study

Gerrit Jan Breukelman, A Joubert, Lourens Millard, Silindokuhle Sanele Radebe
5 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
12.19
article

Primary Motives and Barriers to Physical Activity Participation Among Students Registered at a Semi-Rural University: A Mixed-Methods Study

Gerrit Jan Breukelman, A Joubert, Lourens Millard, Silindokuhle Sanele Radebe
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Physical inactivity among university students remains a global health concern, especially in semi-rural settings where unique barriers such as limited facilities, cultural norms, and inadequate transportation persist. This study aimed to identify the primary motivations and barriers to physical activity participation among students at a semi-rural university, providing insights for tailored interventions. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was used. In the quantitative phase, 414 questionnaires were distributed across four faculties, with 328 completed responses analysed using <i>t</i>-tests and factor analysis. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 23 students, analysed through conventional content analysis. The quantitative findings revealed key motivators for physical activity, which included enjoyment (mean = 4.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001), social interaction (mean = 3.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and health benefits (mean = 3.27, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, for barriers, heavy academic workload reached statistical significance (mean = 3.88, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast, qualitative data uncovered additional barriers such as insufficient facilities and poor communication, which were not captured in the quantitative phase. Factor analysis identified four constructs for motivations (e.g., coaching, social, health, enjoyment) and barriers (e.g., club processes, excuses, external factors, lack of interest). Qualitative data corroborated these findings, highlighting issues such as insufficient visibility of physical activity programs, time barriers, and inconsistent coaching quality. This study underscores the importance of addressing structural barriers, such as upgrading facilities, improving communication strategies, and enhancing coaching quality, to increase physical activity participation. By implementing strategic interventions, universities can foster inclusive environments that better support students' well-being and engagement, ultimately promoting healthier lifestyles among university populations.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(3)
University of Zululand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
12.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.