IBC Oxford University Poster Abstract 12 - Naturally banded sleeve gastrectomy (sewefy wrap) <i>versus</i> non-banded sleeve gastrectomy, reporting of early results

Abstract Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure, but weight regain remains the main drawback. Banded Sleeve improves the long-term result of LSG on weight loss but, as a foreign body, it has some serious complications. We aimed to test the efficacy of using the round ligament of the liver as a natural band with LSG. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2022 to December 2023 at Minia university hospital, included 80 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups. Group 1: patients were operated by LSG plus banding using the round ligament of the liver. Group 2: patients were operated on by standard LSG without banding. All cases completed one year follow up. Results Of the patients, 55 (68.8%) were females, and 25 (31.2%) were male. The mean BMI was 47.6 kg/m2. The mean age was 36.3 years. The operative time was 37 minutes in Group 1 versus 33 minutes in Group 2 (P &amp;lt; .001). The mean gastric volume at one year in Group 1 was 110 ml versus 147 ml in Group 2 (P &amp;lt; .0001). The mean %EWL at one year in Group 1 was 85.8 versus 79.5 in Group 2 (P = 0.002). The mean score of food intolerance after one year was 20.8 in Group 1 versus 21.1 in Group 2 (P = .172). Conclusion Naturally banded SG leads to better weight loss than non-banded SG at one year after surgery with minimal sleeve pouch dilatation, but long term follow up is needed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf036.063
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IBC Oxford University Poster Abstract 12 - Naturally banded sleeve gastrectomy (sewefy wrap) versus non-banded sleeve gastrectomy, reporting of early results

Taha Kayed, Alaa Moustafa Hassan Sewefy, Tamer E Esmaeel
British journal of surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

IBC Oxford University Poster Abstract 12 - Naturally banded sleeve gastrectomy (sewefy wrap) versus non-banded sleeve gastrectomy, reporting of early results

Taha Kayed, Alaa Moustafa Hassan Sewefy, Tamer E Esmaeel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure, but weight regain remains the main drawback. Banded Sleeve improves the long-term result of LSG on weight loss but, as a foreign body, it has some serious complications. We aimed to test the efficacy of using the round ligament of the liver as a natural band with LSG. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2022 to December 2023 at Minia university hospital, included 80 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups. Group 1: patients were operated by LSG plus banding using the round ligament of the liver. Group 2: patients were operated on by standard LSG without banding. All cases completed one year follow up. Results Of the patients, 55 (68.8%) were females, and 25 (31.2%) were male. The mean BMI was 47.6 kg/m2. The mean age was 36.3 years. The operative time was 37 minutes in Group 1 versus 33 minutes in Group 2 (P &amp;lt; .001). The mean gastric volume at one year in Group 1 was 110 ml versus 147 ml in Group 2 (P &amp;lt; .0001). The mean %EWL at one year in Group 1 was 85.8 versus 79.5 in Group 2 (P = 0.002). The mean score of food intolerance after one year was 20.8 in Group 1 versus 21.1 in Group 2 (P = .172). Conclusion Naturally banded SG leads to better weight loss than non-banded SG at one year after surgery with minimal sleeve pouch dilatation, but long term follow up is needed.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.