Multiscale spatial dependency of small mammal diversity patterns and their determinants

Abstract Animals perceive their ecosystems at multiple spatial scales such that the pattern–process relationships that determine their ecological and evolutionary opportunities are also spatially variable. Understanding how spatial scale impacts our observations of ecological and evolutionary patterns and processes is therefore crucial for effective biodiversity management. In this study, using a comprehensive dataset of small mammals from primary field surveys supplemented with literature data across Kenya, we investigated the effects of spatial scale on the distribution patterns of taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity indices. We also tested how relationships between taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity and various environmental and anthropogenic variables change across spatial scales. The results showed that with increasing spatial scale, species richness and phylogenetic and functional richness consistently increased. Community‐wide mean pairwise distance indices for phylogenetic and functional dimensions also increased, while fine‐scale mean nearest taxon distance indices decreased. Notably, community structure indices exhibited nonmonotonic patterns across spatial scales. The associations between diversity patterns and environmental and human covariates increased with scale but were more variable and complex across regions. These findings highlight a negative correlation between spatial scale and phylogenetic and functional divergence while reinforcing the species‐area hypotheses for richness‐dependent diversity indices. Identifying the optimal scales of field studies and conservational actions must factor in the species group of interest and the geographical context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70179
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiscale spatial dependency of small mammal diversity patterns and their determinants

Wenyu Song, Xueyou Li, Zhongzheng Chen, Noé U. de la Sancha et al.
2 citations
Ecosphere
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
3.43
article

Multiscale spatial dependency of small mammal diversity patterns and their determinants

Wenyu Song, Xueyou Li, Zhongzheng Chen, Noé U. de la Sancha, Xuelong Jiang, Kenneth Otieno Onditi, Quan Li, Simon Musila
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Animals perceive their ecosystems at multiple spatial scales such that the pattern–process relationships that determine their ecological and evolutionary opportunities are also spatially variable. Understanding how spatial scale impacts our observations of ecological and evolutionary patterns and processes is therefore crucial for effective biodiversity management. In this study, using a comprehensive dataset of small mammals from primary field surveys supplemented with literature data across Kenya, we investigated the effects of spatial scale on the distribution patterns of taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity indices. We also tested how relationships between taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity and various environmental and anthropogenic variables change across spatial scales. The results showed that with increasing spatial scale, species richness and phylogenetic and functional richness consistently increased. Community‐wide mean pairwise distance indices for phylogenetic and functional dimensions also increased, while fine‐scale mean nearest taxon distance indices decreased. Notably, community structure indices exhibited nonmonotonic patterns across spatial scales. The associations between diversity patterns and environmental and human covariates increased with scale but were more variable and complex across regions. These findings highlight a negative correlation between spatial scale and phylogenetic and functional divergence while reinforcing the species‐area hypotheses for richness‐dependent diversity indices. Identifying the optimal scales of field studies and conservational actions must factor in the species group of interest and the geographical context.

EcosphereVol. 16(2)
DePaul University (US), Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Field Museum of Natural History (US), National Museums of Kenya (KE), Anhui Normal University (CN), Dali University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Joint Research Centre, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.