Are Cocks Animals? ‘Presumptions’ and Facts of ‘Common Knowledge’ in Cases Involving Sanctioned Persons

The article analyses in detail the judicial practice that has been forming since the end of 2021 on the application of Article 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in disputes between sanctioned Russian persons and companies from ‘unfriendly’ jurisdictions in the view of the classical doctrines of law of evidence. The author concludes that modern approaches of Russian courts to proving in these cases, despite the fact that they are in line with the general policy of supporting domestic business, are difficult to describe in procedural terms known to jurisprudence. Such an observation makes suspect that we are facing an attempt to solve a problem with procedural tools, which is actually remotely related to evidence, but lies in the plane of substantive law, in the sphere of regulating economic (non-procedural) relations with ‘unfriendly’ foreigners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zakon
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2025-22-2-33-49
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Cocks Animals? ‘Presumptions’ and Facts of ‘Common Knowledge’ in Cases Involving Sanctioned Persons

Mikhail L. Galperin
Zakon
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Are Cocks Animals? ‘Presumptions’ and Facts of ‘Common Knowledge’ in Cases Involving Sanctioned Persons

Mikhail L. Galperin
article en

Abstract

The article analyses in detail the judicial practice that has been forming since the end of 2021 on the application of Article 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in disputes between sanctioned Russian persons and companies from ‘unfriendly’ jurisdictions in the view of the classical doctrines of law of evidence. The author concludes that modern approaches of Russian courts to proving in these cases, despite the fact that they are in line with the general policy of supporting domestic business, are difficult to describe in procedural terms known to jurisprudence. Such an observation makes suspect that we are facing an attempt to solve a problem with procedural tools, which is actually remotely related to evidence, but lies in the plane of substantive law, in the sphere of regulating economic (non-procedural) relations with ‘unfriendly’ foreigners.

ZakonVol. 22(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.