Rover Science Autonomy in Planetary Exploration: Field Analog Tests

Abstract A strategy for planetary exploration using a rover capable of science autonomy is presented. We encoded into a rover a set of driving hypotheses pertaining to the geologic origin of a field site and equipped the rover with the instrumentation needed to measure the observables related to the hypotheses, as well as the software tools to analyze them to a relatively high level of confidence. We investigated the effects of different exploration strategies that make use of rover science autonomy and compared the operational efficiency and science yield of three geological exploration scenarios: (1) standard human-directed exploration, (2) rover-directed exploration, and (3) astronaut/rover collaborative exploration. We show that exploration with a rover capable of science autonomy is operationally more efficient than the human-directed strategy, resulting in higher rates of data collection and hence a greater science yield per command cycle. Additionally, we explored and developed astronaut/rover collaborative exploration strategies and present a basic framework for effective planetary exploration that leverages the expertise of a science team, the efficiency of a science-autonomous rover, and the contextual abilities of astronauts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Planetary Science Journal
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/adaa78
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rover Science Autonomy in Planetary Exploration: Field Analog Tests

G. M. Holsclaw, Caitlin Ahrens, T. H. Prettyman, Srinivasan Vijayarangan et al.
The Planetary Science Journal
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Rover Science Autonomy in Planetary Exploration: Field Analog Tests

G. M. Holsclaw, Caitlin Ahrens, T. H. Prettyman, Srinivasan Vijayarangan, Margaret Hansen, T. F. Bristow, M. D. Lane, Alberto Candela, Audrey Martin, Amanda Hendrix, G. Y. Kramer, Ernie Bell, J. P. Knightly, Neil Pearson, Nandita Kumari, Gregg A. Swayze, McKayla L. Meier, F. Vilas, E. Z. Noe Dobrea, M. E. Banks, Sanlyn Buxner, D. T. Vaniman, S. P. Wright, R. N. Clark, David Wettergreen, Roy D. Patterson, Abigail Breitfeld
article en

Abstract

Abstract A strategy for planetary exploration using a rover capable of science autonomy is presented. We encoded into a rover a set of driving hypotheses pertaining to the geologic origin of a field site and equipped the rover with the instrumentation needed to measure the observables related to the hypotheses, as well as the software tools to analyze them to a relatively high level of confidence. We investigated the effects of different exploration strategies that make use of rover science autonomy and compared the operational efficiency and science yield of three geological exploration scenarios: (1) standard human-directed exploration, (2) rover-directed exploration, and (3) astronaut/rover collaborative exploration. We show that exploration with a rover capable of science autonomy is operationally more efficient than the human-directed strategy, resulting in higher rates of data collection and hence a greater science yield per command cycle. Additionally, we explored and developed astronaut/rover collaborative exploration strategies and present a basic framework for effective planetary exploration that leverages the expertise of a science team, the efficiency of a science-autonomous rover, and the contextual abilities of astronauts.

The Planetary Science JournalVol. 6(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.