Legislating and adjudicating the rights of LGBTQ youth in child welfare

Summary Over the past 40 years, protections have been enacted in recognition of the unique struggles faced by LGBTQ youth in systems of child welfare, including adoption, foster care, probate and family court, and child protection. These protections have been enacted out of recognition that LGBTQ children are both highly vulnerable and disproportionately represented in these systems. This article examines the history, rhetoric and current landscape of conflicting efforts to both protect LGBTQ youth and erode such protections where they presently exist. Findings Presently, forces are attempting to roll back protections for LGBTQ youth in social services through the courts, as well as enact new avenues for discrimination as part of a political campaign broadly centered under the rhetoric of “parental rights.” In addition to legal battles, new legislation has been proposed which would prevent social workers, teachers, and other human service providers from taking LGBTQ identities into account when assessing a child’s best interest. While public debate has focused on these challenges with respect to schools, less attention has been paid to other domains such as foster care. Applications Social workers and other human service providers must respond to this challenge and preserve protections for vulnerable youth. A failure to institute and maintain policies which elevate youth self-determination represents a fundamental failure to protect youth. This must be resisted by individual social workers and our respective professional organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Work
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173251318575
Citations
3
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legislating and adjudicating the rights of LGBTQ youth in child welfare

Jared Douglas Kant, Madeline H. Bono, Elizabeth R. Boskey
3 citations
Journal of Social Work
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
7.32
article

Legislating and adjudicating the rights of LGBTQ youth in child welfare

Jared Douglas Kant, Madeline H. Bono, Elizabeth R. Boskey
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Summary Over the past 40 years, protections have been enacted in recognition of the unique struggles faced by LGBTQ youth in systems of child welfare, including adoption, foster care, probate and family court, and child protection. These protections have been enacted out of recognition that LGBTQ children are both highly vulnerable and disproportionately represented in these systems. This article examines the history, rhetoric and current landscape of conflicting efforts to both protect LGBTQ youth and erode such protections where they presently exist. Findings Presently, forces are attempting to roll back protections for LGBTQ youth in social services through the courts, as well as enact new avenues for discrimination as part of a political campaign broadly centered under the rhetoric of “parental rights.” In addition to legal battles, new legislation has been proposed which would prevent social workers, teachers, and other human service providers from taking LGBTQ identities into account when assessing a child’s best interest. While public debate has focused on these challenges with respect to schools, less attention has been paid to other domains such as foster care. Applications Social workers and other human service providers must respond to this challenge and preserve protections for vulnerable youth. A failure to institute and maintain policies which elevate youth self-determination represents a fundamental failure to protect youth. This must be resisted by individual social workers and our respective professional organizations.

Journal of Social WorkVol. 25(6)
Boston University (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University School (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legislating and adjudicating the rights of LGBTQ youth in child welfare — Jared Douglas Kant, Madeline H. Bono, et al. · Journal of Social Work (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS