AI and labor: Captioning library audiovisual content with Whisper

This paper examines the impact of Whisper, an open-source AI automated speech recognition (ASR) software, on captioning work at Emory Libraries and the staff who conduct the work. Captions are essential for searchability, discoverability, and user accessibility; however, providing captions has typically been challenging due to the resources required. Whisper shows potential for enabling proactive captioning of digitized content but also raises questions about the impact of ASR-generated captions on the staff engaged in this and similar work. With data collected from a grant-funded captioning project and an ongoing oral history program, this paper examines this impact and observes that while Whisper reduces the most labor-intensive phase of captioning, this does not necessarily entail a reduction in staff time, due to changing demand and the ongoing need for human review in providing accurate, high-quality captions and transcripts. Whisper's overall impact may be on transforming human labor rather than replacing it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352241310534
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and labor: Captioning library audiovisual content with Whisper

Jonathan Coulis, Simon O’Riordan, N. Laxman Rao
1 citations
IFLA Journal
Law in Society and Culture
15.98
article

AI and labor: Captioning library audiovisual content with Whisper

Jonathan Coulis, Simon O’Riordan, N. Laxman Rao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Whisper, an open-source AI automated speech recognition (ASR) software, on captioning work at Emory Libraries and the staff who conduct the work. Captions are essential for searchability, discoverability, and user accessibility; however, providing captions has typically been challenging due to the resources required. Whisper shows potential for enabling proactive captioning of digitized content but also raises questions about the impact of ASR-generated captions on the staff engaged in this and similar work. With data collected from a grant-funded captioning project and an ongoing oral history program, this paper examines this impact and observes that while Whisper reduces the most labor-intensive phase of captioning, this does not necessarily entail a reduction in staff time, due to changing demand and the ongoing need for human review in providing accurate, high-quality captions and transcripts. Whisper's overall impact may be on transforming human labor rather than replacing it.

IFLA JournalVol. 51(3)
Emory University (US)
LYRASIS
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Law in Society and Culture
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.