Trueness and precision of complete denture digital impression compared to conventional impression: an <i>in vitro</i> study
The overall trueness, Medit had the highest deviation compared to the VPS and TRIOS groups with a <i>P</i> value of 0.0013 and <0.0001, respectively. In terms of overall precision, TRIOS had a lower deviation than the VPS group, with a <i>P</i> value of 0.0002. The TRIOS and Medit groups had statistically comparable results. The desktop scanner showed the highest precision in digitizing completely edentulous cases, followed by the TRIOS scanner. The Medit scanner's trueness had the highest deviation compared to the VPS and TRIOS groups.
Authors
- Yousif A. Al‐Dulaijan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-8903)
- Passent Ellakany (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-8111)
- Shaimaa M. Fouda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-4882)
- Mohammed M. Gad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-2356)
- Faisal D. al‐Qarni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-5979)
- Haidar Alalawi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-4720)
Institutions
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2025-02-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19075
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Dental materials and restorations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 11.73