Temporal <i>de Re</i> and semantic variation: Composing simultaneity in Asante Twi

This paper explores the temporal interpretation of attitude reports (AttR) in the Asante (Twi) dialect of Akan (Kwa, Niger Congo), with a focus on deriving the (past) simultaneous (SIM) reading in X-under-Past embeddings. We note that SIM in Asante arises when X represents: (i) the bare form, (ii) the distal deictic tense ná or (marginally) (iii) the perfective past LEN - with a decreasing preference in that order from (i) to (iii). Based on our empirical findings, accounts postulating deletion or binding of the embedded tense are ruled out for (ii) and (iii). Therefore, we propose that, while the bare form is associated with a de Se binding construal, both ná and LEN involve only a de Re construal. Consequently, we suggest that the speakers’ choices in embedding are guided by two pragmatic principles: one that favours de Se over de Re LFs (for (i) over (ii) and (iii)) and another that favours unbounded over bounded event structures (for (i) and (ii) over (iii)).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3765/t3fr0n66
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal de Re and semantic variation: Composing simultaneity in Asante Twi

Giuliano Armenante
Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Temporal de Re and semantic variation: Composing simultaneity in Asante Twi

Giuliano Armenante
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the temporal interpretation of attitude reports (AttR) in the Asante (Twi) dialect of Akan (Kwa, Niger Congo), with a focus on deriving the (past) simultaneous (SIM) reading in X-under-Past embeddings. We note that SIM in Asante arises when X represents: (i) the bare form, (ii) the distal deictic tense ná or (marginally) (iii) the perfective past LEN - with a decreasing preference in that order from (i) to (iii). Based on our empirical findings, accounts postulating deletion or binding of the embedded tense are ruled out for (ii) and (iii). Therefore, we propose that, while the bare form is associated with a de Se binding construal, both ná and LEN involve only a de Re construal. Consequently, we suggest that the speakers’ choices in embedding are guided by two pragmatic principles: one that favours de Se over de Re LFs (for (i) over (ii) and (iii)) and another that favours unbounded over bounded event structures (for (i) and (ii) over (iii)).

Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory
University of Potsdam (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.