‘Thank you in advance for not changing my retirement home’s intrinsic beauty’: NIMBYism, environmental privilege and the politics of offshore wind energy

The development of new wind energy infrastructure is widely supported in the United States. Yet, the siting of wind farms is often contentious. This research problematises how local stakeholders frame their opposition to offshore wind projects at a time when the swift adoption of renewable energies is generally seen as a necessity for environmental, social and economic reasons. Through qualitative content analysis of eighty-nine public comments pertaining to offshore wind projects planned off the North Carolina coast, we argue that objections to wind projects reflect an understanding of the infrastructure’s environmental burden and, importantly, a desire to protect environmental privilege. Findings suggest a need for expanded research on the dimensions of privilege that may be at play across wind farm sites and that any consideration of a just transition must consider how expressions of privilege inform environmental political discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Studies & Society
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26349817251315582
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Thank you in advance for not changing my retirement home’s intrinsic beauty’: NIMBYism, environmental privilege and the politics of offshore wind energy

Brian O’Neill, Matthew Jerome Schneider
3 citations
Coastal Studies & Society
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
12.60
article

‘Thank you in advance for not changing my retirement home’s intrinsic beauty’: NIMBYism, environmental privilege and the politics of offshore wind energy

Brian O’Neill, Matthew Jerome Schneider
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The development of new wind energy infrastructure is widely supported in the United States. Yet, the siting of wind farms is often contentious. This research problematises how local stakeholders frame their opposition to offshore wind projects at a time when the swift adoption of renewable energies is generally seen as a necessity for environmental, social and economic reasons. Through qualitative content analysis of eighty-nine public comments pertaining to offshore wind projects planned off the North Carolina coast, we argue that objections to wind projects reflect an understanding of the infrastructure’s environmental burden and, importantly, a desire to protect environmental privilege. Findings suggest a need for expanded research on the dimensions of privilege that may be at play across wind farm sites and that any consideration of a just transition must consider how expressions of privilege inform environmental political discourse.

Coastal Studies & SocietyVol. 4(1)
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), University of Washington (US), The Ocean Foundation (US)
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Ocean Nexus Center, EarthLab, University of Washington
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.