The M-PerFeCt questionnaire: assessing higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context

Abstract In higher education, teacher feedback has increasingly been replaced or complemented with peer feedback. But, when students lack motivation, they may not participate in the peer feedback activity adequately, and, thus, the activity may not have the desired effect. Motivation is a complex, difficult-to-measure concept, and existing questionnaires for assessing students’ motivation in the context of a peer feedback intervention in higher education have each considered only a few aspects of motivation to learn or motivation to participate in the peer feedback activity. However, a questionnaire that concurrently assesses (almost) all aspects of higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context is needed for researchers and practitioners to obtain a complete picture of students’ motivation, so they can determine whether and how this motivation needs to be improved. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the M otivation in a Pe e r Fe edback C ontex t (M-PerFeCt) questionnaire. Methodological pluralism was used to capture this complex concept while ensuring more rigorous scientific results, including eliciting a student and expert appraisal of the questionnaire and collecting responses to the questionnaire from higher education students in The Netherlands and performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Pre-activity and post-activity forms of the questionnaire were developed and validated. The final questionnaire comprised 66 items in 19 scales. The questionnaire provides insight into the underlying structure of students’ motivation in a peer feedback context. Additionally, it enables teachers and researchers to assess students’ motivation in a peer feedback context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02084-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The M-PerFeCt questionnaire: assessing higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context

Kim Schildkamp, Maaike Christine Heitink, Bernard P. Veldkamp, Priyanka D. Pereira
1 citations
Quality & Quantity
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
article

The M-PerFeCt questionnaire: assessing higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context

Kim Schildkamp, Maaike Christine Heitink, Bernard P. Veldkamp, Priyanka D. Pereira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In higher education, teacher feedback has increasingly been replaced or complemented with peer feedback. But, when students lack motivation, they may not participate in the peer feedback activity adequately, and, thus, the activity may not have the desired effect. Motivation is a complex, difficult-to-measure concept, and existing questionnaires for assessing students’ motivation in the context of a peer feedback intervention in higher education have each considered only a few aspects of motivation to learn or motivation to participate in the peer feedback activity. However, a questionnaire that concurrently assesses (almost) all aspects of higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context is needed for researchers and practitioners to obtain a complete picture of students’ motivation, so they can determine whether and how this motivation needs to be improved. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the M otivation in a Pe e r Fe edback C ontex t (M-PerFeCt) questionnaire. Methodological pluralism was used to capture this complex concept while ensuring more rigorous scientific results, including eliciting a student and expert appraisal of the questionnaire and collecting responses to the questionnaire from higher education students in The Netherlands and performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Pre-activity and post-activity forms of the questionnaire were developed and validated. The final questionnaire comprised 66 items in 19 scales. The questionnaire provides insight into the underlying structure of students’ motivation in a peer feedback context. Additionally, it enables teachers and researchers to assess students’ motivation in a peer feedback context.

Quality & QuantityVol. 59(3)
University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.