Dyadic differences in empathy scores are associated with kinematic similarity during conversational question–answer pairs

During conversation, speakers coordinate and synergize their behaviors at multiple levels, and in different ways. The extent to which individuals converge or diverge in their behaviors during interaction may relate to interpersonal differences relevant to social interaction, such as empathy as measured by the empathy quotient (EQ). An association between interpersonal difference in empathy and interpersonal entrainment could help to throw light on how interlocutor characteristics influence interpersonal entrainment. We investigated this possibility in a corpus of unconstrained conversation between dyads. We used dynamic time warping to quantify entrainment between interlocutors of head motion, hand motion, and maximum speech <i>f0</i> during question-response sequences. We additionally calculated interlocutor differences in EQ scores. We found that, for both head and hand motion, greater difference in EQ was associated with higher entrainment. Thus, we consider that people who are dissimilar in EQ may need to "ground" their interaction with low-level movement entrainment. There was no significant relationship between <i>f0</i> entrainment and EQ score differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Processes
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2025.2467605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dyadic differences in empathy scores are associated with kinematic similarity during conversational question–answer pairs

Judith Holler, James P. Trujillo, Rebecca Dyer
1 citations
Discourse Processes
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.12
article

Dyadic differences in empathy scores are associated with kinematic similarity during conversational question–answer pairs

Judith Holler, James P. Trujillo, Rebecca Dyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

During conversation, speakers coordinate and synergize their behaviors at multiple levels, and in different ways. The extent to which individuals converge or diverge in their behaviors during interaction may relate to interpersonal differences relevant to social interaction, such as empathy as measured by the empathy quotient (EQ). An association between interpersonal difference in empathy and interpersonal entrainment could help to throw light on how interlocutor characteristics influence interpersonal entrainment. We investigated this possibility in a corpus of unconstrained conversation between dyads. We used dynamic time warping to quantify entrainment between interlocutors of head motion, hand motion, and maximum speech <i>f0</i> during question-response sequences. We additionally calculated interlocutor differences in EQ scores. We found that, for both head and hand motion, greater difference in EQ was associated with higher entrainment. Thus, we consider that people who are dissimilar in EQ may need to "ground" their interaction with low-level movement entrainment. There was no significant relationship between <i>f0</i> entrainment and EQ score differences.

Discourse ProcessesVol. 62(3)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL), Cardiff University (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dyadic differences in empathy scores are associated with kinematic similarity during conversational question–answer pairs — Judith Holler, James P. Trujillo, et al. · Discourse Processes (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS