A Novel Blend of Dietary Ingredients Mitigates Blood and Breath Ethanol Levels After Acute Alcohol Intake

Introduction: Various ingredients have been postulated to attenuate the cognitive and physiological effects of alcohol and next-day hangovers. However, few studies have focused on ingredients that may mitigate the acute effects of alcohol. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine if a novel blend of dietary ingredients would attenuate blood (BAC) and breath (BrAC) ethanol levels after acute alcohol ingestion. Methods: Thirty-five individuals participated in this double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial (&num;NCT06106620). Participants completed screening and two testing visits. During testing, participants consumed 100mL of alcohol immediately followed by either the supplement blend (SS) or a flavor-matched placebo (PL). BrAC, BAC, and biomarkers related to alcohol metabolism [acetaldehyde, alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)] were made prior to and 30-, 45-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, and 240-min post ingestion, whereas vital signs, urine volume, and subjective mood ratings were made prior to alcohol consumption and 60-, 120-, 180-, and 240-min post. Results: SS had lower BrAC during the entire post-consumption period (p ≤ 0.05, d = 0.57– 1.07) and lower BAC at 30-, 60-, and 180-min (p ≤ 0.05) post-consumption vs PL. SS had a lower (p ≤ 0.05) area under the curve (AUC, d = 0.71) and concentration maximum (Cmax, d = 0.58) for ethanol, and a higher AUC (d = 0.45, d = 0.54, respectively) and Cmax (d = 0.38, d = 0.47, respectively) than PL for acetaldehyde and ALDH levels. Urine output was greater in SS vs PL at 60-min post consumption (p < 0.001, d = 1.18). There were more favorable responses for SS vs PL [ie, less head discomfort (d = 0.47), less fatigue (d = 0.59), more energy (d = 0.48), less tiredness (d = 0.41), and better concentration (d = 0.41) (all p ≤ 0.05)]. There were no differences in nausea and thirst (p > 0.10). Discussion: Overall, SS was effective in reducing BrAC, BAC, and enhancing subjective mood ratings over a 4-hr post alcohol-consumption period vs PL. Thus, SS may mitigate the negative effects induced by acute alcohol intake. Keywords: alcohol metabolism, antioxidants, acetaldehyde, alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/nds.s507571
Primary Topic
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Blend of Dietary Ingredients Mitigates Blood and Breath Ethanol Levels After Acute Alcohol Intake

Betsy Raub, Ashley Gustat, Jodi Grdic, Shelley Hartshorn et al.
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
article

A Novel Blend of Dietary Ingredients Mitigates Blood and Breath Ethanol Levels After Acute Alcohol Intake

Betsy Raub, Ashley Gustat, Jodi Grdic, Shelley Hartshorn, Michael La Monica, Jennifer Sandrock
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Various ingredients have been postulated to attenuate the cognitive and physiological effects of alcohol and next-day hangovers. However, few studies have focused on ingredients that may mitigate the acute effects of alcohol. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine if a novel blend of dietary ingredients would attenuate blood (BAC) and breath (BrAC) ethanol levels after acute alcohol ingestion. Methods: Thirty-five individuals participated in this double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial (&num;NCT06106620). Participants completed screening and two testing visits. During testing, participants consumed 100mL of alcohol immediately followed by either the supplement blend (SS) or a flavor-matched placebo (PL). BrAC, BAC, and biomarkers related to alcohol metabolism [acetaldehyde, alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)] were made prior to and 30-, 45-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, and 240-min post ingestion, whereas vital signs, urine volume, and subjective mood ratings were made prior to alcohol consumption and 60-, 120-, 180-, and 240-min post. Results: SS had lower BrAC during the entire post-consumption period (p ≤ 0.05, d = 0.57– 1.07) and lower BAC at 30-, 60-, and 180-min (p ≤ 0.05) post-consumption vs PL. SS had a lower (p ≤ 0.05) area under the curve (AUC, d = 0.71) and concentration maximum (Cmax, d = 0.58) for ethanol, and a higher AUC (d = 0.45, d = 0.54, respectively) and Cmax (d = 0.38, d = 0.47, respectively) than PL for acetaldehyde and ALDH levels. Urine output was greater in SS vs PL at 60-min post consumption (p < 0.001, d = 1.18). There were more favorable responses for SS vs PL [ie, less head discomfort (d = 0.47), less fatigue (d = 0.59), more energy (d = 0.48), less tiredness (d = 0.41), and better concentration (d = 0.41) (all p ≤ 0.05)]. There were no differences in nausea and thirst (p > 0.10). Discussion: Overall, SS was effective in reducing BrAC, BAC, and enhancing subjective mood ratings over a 4-hr post alcohol-consumption period vs PL. Thus, SS may mitigate the negative effects induced by acute alcohol intake. Keywords: alcohol metabolism, antioxidants, acetaldehyde, alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase

Nutrition and Dietary SupplementsVol. Volume 17
Canfield Scientific (United States) (US)
Auburn University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.