Mathematics Matters or Maybe Not: An Astonishing Independence between Mathematics and the Rate of Learning in General Chemistry

Research spanning nearly a century has found that mathematics plays an important role in the learning of chemistry. Here, we use a large dataset of student interactions with online courseware to investigate the details of this link between mathematics and chemistry. The activities in the courseware are labeled against a list of knowledge components (KCs) covered by the content, and student interactions are tracked over a full semester of general chemistry at a range of institutions. Logistic regression is used to model student performance as a function of the number of opportunities a student has taken to engage with a particular KC. This regression analysis generates estimates of both the initial knowledge and the learning rate for each student and each KC. Consistent with results from other domains, the initial knowledge varies substantially across students, but the learning rate is nearly the same for all students. The role of mathematics is investigated by labeling each KC with the level of math involved. The overwhelming result from regressions based on these labels is that only the initial knowledge varies strongly across students and across the level of math involved in a particular topic. The student learning rate is nearly independent of both the level of math involved in a KC and the prior mathematical preparation of an individual student. The observation that the primary challenge for students lies in initial knowledge, rather than learning rate, may have implications for course and curriculum design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACS Au
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c01126
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematics Matters or Maybe Not: An Astonishing Independence between Mathematics and the Rate of Learning in General Chemistry

Mark Blaser, Elizabeth A. McLaughlin, Kenneth R. Koedinger, David Yaron et al.
6 citations
JACS Au
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
14.89
article

Mathematics Matters or Maybe Not: An Astonishing Independence between Mathematics and the Rate of Learning in General Chemistry

Mark Blaser, Elizabeth A. McLaughlin, Kenneth R. Koedinger, David Yaron, Hui Cheng
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Research spanning nearly a century has found that mathematics plays an important role in the learning of chemistry. Here, we use a large dataset of student interactions with online courseware to investigate the details of this link between mathematics and chemistry. The activities in the courseware are labeled against a list of knowledge components (KCs) covered by the content, and student interactions are tracked over a full semester of general chemistry at a range of institutions. Logistic regression is used to model student performance as a function of the number of opportunities a student has taken to engage with a particular KC. This regression analysis generates estimates of both the initial knowledge and the learning rate for each student and each KC. Consistent with results from other domains, the initial knowledge varies substantially across students, but the learning rate is nearly the same for all students. The role of mathematics is investigated by labeling each KC with the level of math involved. The overwhelming result from regressions based on these labels is that only the initial knowledge varies strongly across students and across the level of math involved in a particular topic. The student learning rate is nearly independent of both the level of math involved in a KC and the prior mathematical preparation of an individual student. The observation that the primary challenge for students lies in initial knowledge, rather than learning rate, may have implications for course and curriculum design.

JACS AuVol. 5(3)
Human Computer Interaction (Switzerland) (CH), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Division of Information and Intelligent Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.