Exploring Backbone Network Choices in FCOS3D: Performance and Efficiency Analysis

This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance of two modified object detection models, FCOS-Swin and FCOS-ConvNeXt, against the FCOS3D baseline model using the nuScenes dataset. The study evaluates the models based on their classification results for various categories of objects and on multiple evaluation metrics. We compare FCOS-Swin and FCOS-ConvNeXt, which utilize different backbone architectures, to evaluate their effectiveness in 3D object detection. Results show that the modified models exhibit comparable performance with slight variations in all metrics compared to the baseline, but fall short of the fine-tuned FCOS3D model. Potential reasons for this performance gap, including model parameter size, data augmentation methods, learning rate settings, and training epochs, are discussed. This study also explores possible improvements and future work, such as switching to larger backbone models, utilizing stronger data augmentation techniques, adjusting the learning rate method, increasing training epochs, and incorporating temporal and spatial logic to optimize model performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/15b9t728
Primary Topic
Advanced Optical Network Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Backbone Network Choices in FCOS3D: Performance and Efficiency Analysis

Linyi He
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Advanced Optical Network Technologies
article

Exploring Backbone Network Choices in FCOS3D: Performance and Efficiency Analysis

Linyi He
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance of two modified object detection models, FCOS-Swin and FCOS-ConvNeXt, against the FCOS3D baseline model using the nuScenes dataset. The study evaluates the models based on their classification results for various categories of objects and on multiple evaluation metrics. We compare FCOS-Swin and FCOS-ConvNeXt, which utilize different backbone architectures, to evaluate their effectiveness in 3D object detection. Results show that the modified models exhibit comparable performance with slight variations in all metrics compared to the baseline, but fall short of the fine-tuned FCOS3D model. Potential reasons for this performance gap, including model parameter size, data augmentation methods, learning rate settings, and training epochs, are discussed. This study also explores possible improvements and future work, such as switching to larger backbone models, utilizing stronger data augmentation techniques, adjusting the learning rate method, increasing training epochs, and incorporating temporal and spatial logic to optimize model performance.

Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental ProtectionVol. 1(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Advanced Optical Network Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Backbone Network Choices in FCOS3D: Performance and Efficiency Analysis — Linyi He · Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS