Comparative effectiveness and prescribing trends of modified release versus immediate release indapamide in patients with hypertension: cohort study

In patients treated with indapamide for hypertension, starting treatment with modified release or immediate release indapamide had similar risks for cardiovascular events or all cause mortality. In an exploratory secondary analysis, sustained treatment with modified release preparations was associated with a lower the risk of cardiovascular events but not all cause mortality compared with immediate release preparations. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Medicine
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000857
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness and prescribing trends of modified release versus immediate release indapamide in patients with hypertension: cohort study

Bryan Williams, Esther W. Chan, Chengsheng Ju, Isla S. Mackenzie et al.
2 citations
BMJ Medicine
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
2.78
article

Comparative effectiveness and prescribing trends of modified release versus immediate release indapamide in patients with hypertension: cohort study

Bryan Williams, Esther W. Chan, Chengsheng Ju, Isla S. Mackenzie, Vincent Ka Chun Yan, Thomas M. MacDonald, George Casella, Yang Chen, Li Wei, R. W. V. Flynn
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In patients treated with indapamide for hypertension, starting treatment with modified release or immediate release indapamide had similar risks for cardiovascular events or all cause mortality. In an exploratory secondary analysis, sustained treatment with modified release preparations was associated with a lower the risk of cardiovascular events but not all cause mortality compared with immediate release preparations. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

BMJ MedicineVol. 4(1)
Department of Health (CN), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Dundee (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Research Institute (CN), University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Institut de Recherche et d’Innovation (FR), University College London (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Wellcome Trust, Diabetes UK, Pharmacy Research UK, Innovation and Technology Commission, Food and Health Bureau, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.