Cosmos (κόσμος) in the Gospel of John: Humanity and the Nonhuman Creation

There is a tendency in recent Johannine scholarship to understand κόσμος in the majority of instances in the Gospel of John as ‘humanity’. It is assumed that the meaning ‘creation’ is appropriate only in a few occurrences. In this article, I want to challenge this consensus in three steps. First, a survey of the scholarship on the Johannine use of κόσμος will focus on the question of whether there is an anthropocentric bias in the history of reception. Second, a semantic analysis will explore the possible passages in which the κόσμος cannot be reduced to humanity but also includes nonhuman creation. Third, an eco-hermeneutical outlook will set the debate in the context of the ecological crisis and focus on the interdependence between humanity and the rest of the cosmos. Is it time to rethink the meaning of κόσμος in light of the climate crises? Does God only love humanity or does he care about his whole creation (3.16)? Is Jesus, according to 4.42, only the savior of humans or also of the ‘more than human creation’? And if so, does doing the works of God (6.28) imply caring for the creation?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064x241301102
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cosmos (κόσμος) in the Gospel of John: Humanity and the Nonhuman Creation

Zacharias Shoukry
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Cosmos (κόσμος) in the Gospel of John: Humanity and the Nonhuman Creation

Zacharias Shoukry
article en

Abstract

There is a tendency in recent Johannine scholarship to understand κόσμος in the majority of instances in the Gospel of John as ‘humanity’. It is assumed that the meaning ‘creation’ is appropriate only in a few occurrences. In this article, I want to challenge this consensus in three steps. First, a survey of the scholarship on the Johannine use of κόσμος will focus on the question of whether there is an anthropocentric bias in the history of reception. Second, a semantic analysis will explore the possible passages in which the κόσμος cannot be reduced to humanity but also includes nonhuman creation. Third, an eco-hermeneutical outlook will set the debate in the context of the ecological crisis and focus on the interdependence between humanity and the rest of the cosmos. Is it time to rethink the meaning of κόσμος in light of the climate crises? Does God only love humanity or does he care about his whole creation (3.16)? Is Jesus, according to 4.42, only the savior of humans or also of the ‘more than human creation’? And if so, does doing the works of God (6.28) imply caring for the creation?

Journal for the Study of the New TestamentVol. 47(3)
University of Rostock (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cosmos (κόσμος) in the Gospel of John: Humanity and the Nonhuman Creation — Zacharias Shoukry · Journal for the Study of the New Testament (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS