Tree growth is better explained by absorptive fine root traits than by transport fine root traits

Although the interest in root traits has increased in recent years, we still have limited knowledge of (i) whether functionally different fine roots-absorptive versus transport roots-have similar trait coordination and (ii) how they help to explain plant performance, such as growth. We measured traits of 25 European broadleaved tree species growing in a research arboretum to study (i) the coordination of root traits within absorptive and transport fine roots and (ii) the degree of trait-tree growth relationships. To do so, we combined a suite of morphological and anatomical traits for each of the absorptive and transport roots. Despite remarkable differences in average trait values between absorptive and transport roots, our study shows that trait coordination within absorptive and transport roots is relatively similar. Our results also show that, for the selected traits, tree growth is better explained by absorptive root traits than by transport root traits and is higher in species with thinner roots. The stronger relationship between absorptive roots and tree growth highlights that roots mostly involved with resource absorption are more important in explaining tree growth than transport roots, which are mainly responsible for resource transportation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-07756-y
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tree growth is better explained by absorptive fine root traits than by transport fine root traits

Alexandra Weigelt, Anvar Sanaei, Fons van der Plas, Susanne Eckhardt et al.
11 citations
Communications Biology
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
19.25
article

Tree growth is better explained by absorptive fine root traits than by transport fine root traits

Alexandra Weigelt, Anvar Sanaei, Fons van der Plas, Susanne Eckhardt, Christian Wirth, Anja Kahl, Ronny Richter, Justus Hennecke, Hongmei Chen, Jana Schütze, Sophie Davids, Yasmin Möller
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Although the interest in root traits has increased in recent years, we still have limited knowledge of (i) whether functionally different fine roots-absorptive versus transport roots-have similar trait coordination and (ii) how they help to explain plant performance, such as growth. We measured traits of 25 European broadleaved tree species growing in a research arboretum to study (i) the coordination of root traits within absorptive and transport fine roots and (ii) the degree of trait-tree growth relationships. To do so, we combined a suite of morphological and anatomical traits for each of the absorptive and transport roots. Despite remarkable differences in average trait values between absorptive and transport roots, our study shows that trait coordination within absorptive and transport roots is relatively similar. Our results also show that, for the selected traits, tree growth is better explained by absorptive root traits than by transport root traits and is higher in species with thinner roots. The stronger relationship between absorptive roots and tree growth highlights that roots mostly involved with resource absorption are more important in explaining tree growth than transport roots, which are mainly responsible for resource transportation.

Communications BiologyVol. 8(1)
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), Lancaster University (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL), Leipzig University (DE)
Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst, Universität Leipzig, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
19.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.