Successful Outpatient Administration of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CarT) Therapies without Remote Monitoring Device Use in a Non-Academic Medical Center

CarT therapy is an effective therapy for hematologic malignancies and solid tumor. Acute toxicities of CarT therapy, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune-effector cell associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS) may necessitate inpatient hospitalization for administration of CarT and subsequent toxicity monitoring and management. However, inpatient administration of CarT may be cost prohibitive for health systems and outpatient CarT administration may improve sustainability of CarT programs. Our center has various monitoring schedules for each CarT product and disease type as described in Table1. We assessed outcomes for patients in our center undergoing outpatient administration separately for four different CarT products (axi-cel, liso-cel, brexu-cel, and ide-cel) and several diagnoses (DLBCL/FL, MZL, MCL, ALL, CLL/SLL, and MM). This is a nonacademic single institution, retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient administration of CarT. All patients undergoing outpatient commercial CarT infusion with at least 30 days post infusion follow up data were eligible. ASTCT grading was used for CRS and ICANS grading. Statistics are descriptive only. 63 patients (pts) underwent outpatient CarT between May 2021 to July 2024 (liso-cel 36pts, bre-cel 6 pts, ide-cel 10 pts, axi-cel 11 pts). Demographics in each CarT product and disease type were described in Table2. Out of 63 pts, 30 pts (48%) did not require hospitalization in Days 0-30. 9 pts (14%) admitted by Day2 (within 72 hours of CarT infusion) and 24 pts (38%) admitted after Day3 of CarT infusion. Only 4pts (6%) had infection in Days0-30. Low grade CRS was observed in 43pts (68%). No grade 3 or higher CRS was noted. Neurotoxicity was observed in 20 pts (grade1/2 15pts 24%, grade3/4 5 pts 8%). CarT related toxicity in Days0-30 in each CarT product and disease type were described in Table3. 45 pts (71%) responded to CarT therapy. OS at 100 days post CarT is 93%. Outcomes in each CarT product and disease type were described in Table4. Outpatient administrations of CarT were conducted successfully at our center. We are recruiting other centers to gather additional data regarding best practices and to study the outcomes for these patients. We expect to help establish the best practices for outpatient CarT in further investigations so that these therapies can be more widely accessible and safe to deliver.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.01.377
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Successful Outpatient Administration of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CarT) Therapies without Remote Monitoring Device Use in a Non-Academic Medical Center

Neil A. Bailey, Chiachun Lu, Krish Patel, Julia E. Parker et al.
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Successful Outpatient Administration of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CarT) Therapies without Remote Monitoring Device Use in a Non-Academic Medical Center

Neil A. Bailey, Chiachun Lu, Krish Patel, Julia E. Parker, Megumi Bailey, Swathi Namburi
article en

Abstract

CarT therapy is an effective therapy for hematologic malignancies and solid tumor. Acute toxicities of CarT therapy, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune-effector cell associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS) may necessitate inpatient hospitalization for administration of CarT and subsequent toxicity monitoring and management. However, inpatient administration of CarT may be cost prohibitive for health systems and outpatient CarT administration may improve sustainability of CarT programs. Our center has various monitoring schedules for each CarT product and disease type as described in Table1. We assessed outcomes for patients in our center undergoing outpatient administration separately for four different CarT products (axi-cel, liso-cel, brexu-cel, and ide-cel) and several diagnoses (DLBCL/FL, MZL, MCL, ALL, CLL/SLL, and MM). This is a nonacademic single institution, retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient administration of CarT. All patients undergoing outpatient commercial CarT infusion with at least 30 days post infusion follow up data were eligible. ASTCT grading was used for CRS and ICANS grading. Statistics are descriptive only. 63 patients (pts) underwent outpatient CarT between May 2021 to July 2024 (liso-cel 36pts, bre-cel 6 pts, ide-cel 10 pts, axi-cel 11 pts). Demographics in each CarT product and disease type were described in Table2. Out of 63 pts, 30 pts (48%) did not require hospitalization in Days 0-30. 9 pts (14%) admitted by Day2 (within 72 hours of CarT infusion) and 24 pts (38%) admitted after Day3 of CarT infusion. Only 4pts (6%) had infection in Days0-30. Low grade CRS was observed in 43pts (68%). No grade 3 or higher CRS was noted. Neurotoxicity was observed in 20 pts (grade1/2 15pts 24%, grade3/4 5 pts 8%). CarT related toxicity in Days0-30 in each CarT product and disease type were described in Table3. 45 pts (71%) responded to CarT therapy. OS at 100 days post CarT is 93%. Outcomes in each CarT product and disease type were described in Table4. Outpatient administrations of CarT were conducted successfully at our center. We are recruiting other centers to gather additional data regarding best practices and to study the outcomes for these patients. We expect to help establish the best practices for outpatient CarT in further investigations so that these therapies can be more widely accessible and safe to deliver.

Transplantation and Cellular TherapyVol. 31(2)
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.