Making Good Economies with Bad Economic Instruments: A brief history of wind power’s changing economies

This article examines how notions of the good are entangled with instruments of valuation in the case of wind power in Denmark. Analytically, we develop what we tentatively call a comparative actantial approach to the study of policy instruments. Empirically, we inspect three support schemes introduced between 1979 and 1999 by the Danish state to foster the development of wind power. The comparative inspection shows wind power's notable shifts in what we call its actantial status: the same character appears as a very different kind of agent in the very different good economies for wind power portrayed by the instruments. The article contributes to two different but related literatures: it contributes to recent intersection between science and technology studies and economic geography inspecting the variable ontologies of energy resources, and it contributes to the discussion in this theme issue about instruments of valuation and the good economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Valuation Studies
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2025.12.1.67-95
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Good Economies with Bad Economic Instruments: A brief history of wind power’s changing economies

Peter Karnøe, José Ossandón, Susse Georg, Trine Pallesen
3 citations
Valuation Studies
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
2.21
article

Making Good Economies with Bad Economic Instruments: A brief history of wind power’s changing economies

Peter Karnøe, José Ossandón, Susse Georg, Trine Pallesen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines how notions of the good are entangled with instruments of valuation in the case of wind power in Denmark. Analytically, we develop what we tentatively call a comparative actantial approach to the study of policy instruments. Empirically, we inspect three support schemes introduced between 1979 and 1999 by the Danish state to foster the development of wind power. The comparative inspection shows wind power's notable shifts in what we call its actantial status: the same character appears as a very different kind of agent in the very different good economies for wind power portrayed by the instruments. The article contributes to two different but related literatures: it contributes to recent intersection between science and technology studies and economic geography inspecting the variable ontologies of energy resources, and it contributes to the discussion in this theme issue about instruments of valuation and the good economy.

Valuation StudiesVol. 12(1)
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.