Continuous glucose monitor overestimates glycemia, with the magnitude of bias varying by postprandial test and individual – a randomized crossover trial
CGM overestimated glycemic responses in numerous contexts. At times, this can mischaracterize the GI. In addition, there is interindividual heterogeneity in the accuracy of CGM in estimating fasting glucose concentrations. Correction for this difference reduces, but does not eliminate, postprandial overestimate of glycemia by CGM. Caution should be applied when inferring absolute or relative glycemic responses to foods using CGM, and capillary sampling should be prioritized for accurate quantification of glycemic response. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06333184.
Authors
- Javier Thomas Gonzalez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-0074)
- Dylan Thompson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6312-1518)
- Aaron Hengist (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-7105)
- James A. Betts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9129-5777)
- Katie Hutchins
Institutions
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)
- University of Bath (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2025-02-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.024
- Citations
- 12
- Primary Topic
- Diabetes Management and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 15.54