Continuous glucose monitor overestimates glycemia, with the magnitude of bias varying by postprandial test and individual – a randomized crossover trial

CGM overestimated glycemic responses in numerous contexts. At times, this can mischaracterize the GI. In addition, there is interindividual heterogeneity in the accuracy of CGM in estimating fasting glucose concentrations. Correction for this difference reduces, but does not eliminate, postprandial overestimate of glycemia by CGM. Caution should be applied when inferring absolute or relative glycemic responses to foods using CGM, and capillary sampling should be prioritized for accurate quantification of glycemic response. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06333184.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.024
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous glucose monitor overestimates glycemia, with the magnitude of bias varying by postprandial test and individual – a randomized crossover trial

Javier Thomas Gonzalez, Dylan Thompson, Aaron Hengist, James A. Betts et al.
12 citations
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Diabetes Management and Research
15.54
article

Continuous glucose monitor overestimates glycemia, with the magnitude of bias varying by postprandial test and individual – a randomized crossover trial

Javier Thomas Gonzalez, Dylan Thompson, Aaron Hengist, James A. Betts, Katie Hutchins
article en
12 citations

Abstract

CGM overestimated glycemic responses in numerous contexts. At times, this can mischaracterize the GI. In addition, there is interindividual heterogeneity in the accuracy of CGM in estimating fasting glucose concentrations. Correction for this difference reduces, but does not eliminate, postprandial overestimate of glycemia by CGM. Caution should be applied when inferring absolute or relative glycemic responses to foods using CGM, and capillary sampling should be prioritized for accurate quantification of glycemic response. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06333184.

American Journal of Clinical NutritionVol. 121(5)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US), University of Bath (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Diabetes Management and Research
15.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.