Resurgence of Diplomatic Asylum in International Law: Human Rights the Missing Piece of Puzzle

Abstract This study evinces that current legal practice does not favour the grant of diplomatic asylum. However, the right to diplomatic asylum is not sufficiently addressed from an individual or human rights lens. Instead, it is conceived as an object of the States exercising its right. In recent years, the courts have widened the scope of human rights to endorse its extraterritorial application, thereby influencing the right to diplomatic asylum. However, this contradicts the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and general international law since granting diplomatic asylum is not a diplomatic function and impinges on state sovereignty. Previous literature on the topic bespeaks the sliding scale and conciliatory approaches in accommodating human rights. The author argues that human rights should be regarded as a valid ground for granting diplomatic asylum. It is concluded that this proposition can challenge the statist approach to diplomatic asylum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-26010001
Primary Topic
International Law and Aviation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resurgence of Diplomatic Asylum in International Law: Human Rights the Missing Piece of Puzzle

Atul Alexander
Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law
International Law and Aviation
article

Resurgence of Diplomatic Asylum in International Law: Human Rights the Missing Piece of Puzzle

Atul Alexander
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evinces that current legal practice does not favour the grant of diplomatic asylum. However, the right to diplomatic asylum is not sufficiently addressed from an individual or human rights lens. Instead, it is conceived as an object of the States exercising its right. In recent years, the courts have widened the scope of human rights to endorse its extraterritorial application, thereby influencing the right to diplomatic asylum. However, this contradicts the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and general international law since granting diplomatic asylum is not a diplomatic function and impinges on state sovereignty. Previous literature on the topic bespeaks the sliding scale and conciliatory approaches in accommodating human rights. The author argues that human rights should be regarded as a valid ground for granting diplomatic asylum. It is concluded that this proposition can challenge the statist approach to diplomatic asylum.

Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the LawVol. 26(1)
West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
International Law and Aviation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.