Serving national security? MNE responses in economic war

We argue that national security concerns can be an important driver of market exit decisions of MNEs. Drawing on institutional theory and using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) on a sample of 196 MNEs from 26 home countries, we find that two factors expressing pressure arising from national security concerns combined with three organizational boundary conditions account for 88 % of exit decisions of MNEs from the Russian market following the start of the Ukraine War. We extend theory by establishing national security as a source of legitimacy pressure affecting MNE strategic choices and by elaborating contingencies under which national security pressures are sufficient for market exit, at least in the context of economic war. Our findings may further be relevant to the sanctions literature in international business by indicating that the impact of sanctions is contingent on organizational-level conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Business
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101628
Citations
6
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serving national security? MNE responses in economic war

Michael A. Witt, Luciano Ciravegna
6 citations
Journal of World Business
International Development and Aid
20.69
article

Serving national security? MNE responses in economic war

Michael A. Witt, Luciano Ciravegna
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We argue that national security concerns can be an important driver of market exit decisions of MNEs. Drawing on institutional theory and using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) on a sample of 196 MNEs from 26 home countries, we find that two factors expressing pressure arising from national security concerns combined with three organizational boundary conditions account for 88 % of exit decisions of MNEs from the Russian market following the start of the Ukraine War. We extend theory by establishing national security as a source of legitimacy pressure affecting MNE strategic choices and by elaborating contingencies under which national security pressures are sufficient for market exit, at least in the context of economic war. Our findings may further be relevant to the sanctions literature in international business by indicating that the impact of sanctions is contingent on organizational-level conditions.

Journal of World BusinessVol. 60(3)
King's College London (GB), King's College School (GB), Instituto Centroamericano de Administración de Empresas (CR)
Florida International University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
International Development and Aid
20.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.