HISTORY AND COLLECTIVE IDENTITY IN LENINGRAD UNDERGROUND POETRY: SERGEI STRATANOVSKY AND SERGEI MAGID

The article deals with the ways of constructing the poetic “we” in two poets belonging to the uno cial Leningrad poetry of the 1970s and 1980s, Sergei Stratanovsky and Sergei Magid. In the work of both authors one can notice a polemic with the understanding of the “we” as an undergoing collective subject, a passive participant in the historical process. These poets look at the historical process and the place of “we” in it from di erent angles: the first focuses on the historical process itself, in which “we” can only be a kind of fuel for indi erent historic forces; the second, on the contrary, tries to apply to the actively feeling and acting modern “we” the plots of sacred history, as if reviving them anew, but still not finally taking them out of the biblical context, they remain “shimmering” - belonging both to the fabulous past and to the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Челябинский гуманитарий
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47475/1999-5407-2025-70-1-52-60
Primary Topic
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HISTORY AND COLLECTIVE IDENTITY IN LENINGRAD UNDERGROUND POETRY: SERGEI STRATANOVSKY AND SERGEI MAGID

Кирилл Корчагин
Челябинский гуманитарий
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
article

HISTORY AND COLLECTIVE IDENTITY IN LENINGRAD UNDERGROUND POETRY: SERGEI STRATANOVSKY AND SERGEI MAGID

Кирилл Корчагин
article en

Abstract

The article deals with the ways of constructing the poetic “we” in two poets belonging to the uno cial Leningrad poetry of the 1970s and 1980s, Sergei Stratanovsky and Sergei Magid. In the work of both authors one can notice a polemic with the understanding of the “we” as an undergoing collective subject, a passive participant in the historical process. These poets look at the historical process and the place of “we” in it from di erent angles: the first focuses on the historical process itself, in which “we” can only be a kind of fuel for indi erent historic forces; the second, on the contrary, tries to apply to the actively feeling and acting modern “we” the plots of sacred history, as if reviving them anew, but still not finally taking them out of the biblical context, they remain “shimmering” - belonging both to the fabulous past and to the future.

Челябинский гуманитарийVol. 70(1)
V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.