Does mercury biomagnification in a boreal lake food web vary year-round? – A comparison using bulk δ15N and compound-specific δ15N of amino acids

Seasonality characterises northern latitude lakes, however, limited knowledge exists regarding seasonal fluctuations in mercury (Hg) biomagnification. This study tested for these fluctuations year-round in the food web of a boreal humic lake (Lake Pääjärvi, in southern Finland) and for differences between two methods of trophic level (TL) determination. A food web sample was collected in three open-water seasons and one ice-covered season. TL was calculated using bulk nitrogen stable isotopes (δ<sup>15</sup>N) and compound-specific stable isotope analysis of δ<sup>15</sup>N in amino acids (CSIA-AA). Biomagnification of total Hg (THg), measured through the linear regression of THg (log<sub>10</sub>[THg]) and TLs, was detected in all seasons using both isotope methods. No significant differences in seasonal trophic magnification slope (TMS), the slope of the linear regression, in- and between methods were found. However, [THg] baseline estimates, the intercept of the linear regression, were significantly different between methods when comparing the same seasons. [THg] baseline values were generally higher in all seasons in bulk δ<sup>15</sup>N than CSIA-AA. Results highlight relatively stable biomagnification among seasons in both methods, however, direct comparisons of bulk δ<sup>15</sup>N and CSIA-AA TLs require further methodological development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Pollution
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125933
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does mercury biomagnification in a boreal lake food web vary year-round? – A comparison using bulk δ15N and compound-specific δ15N of amino acids

Emmi S. Eerola, Sami J. Taipale, Kimmo Kalevi Kahilainen, Alexander J. Piro et al.
2 citations
Environmental Pollution
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
3.43
article

Does mercury biomagnification in a boreal lake food web vary year-round? – A comparison using bulk δ15N and compound-specific δ15N of amino acids

Emmi S. Eerola, Sami J. Taipale, Kimmo Kalevi Kahilainen, Alexander J. Piro, Eszter Megyeri
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Seasonality characterises northern latitude lakes, however, limited knowledge exists regarding seasonal fluctuations in mercury (Hg) biomagnification. This study tested for these fluctuations year-round in the food web of a boreal humic lake (Lake Pääjärvi, in southern Finland) and for differences between two methods of trophic level (TL) determination. A food web sample was collected in three open-water seasons and one ice-covered season. TL was calculated using bulk nitrogen stable isotopes (δ<sup>15</sup>N) and compound-specific stable isotope analysis of δ<sup>15</sup>N in amino acids (CSIA-AA). Biomagnification of total Hg (THg), measured through the linear regression of THg (log<sub>10</sub>[THg]) and TLs, was detected in all seasons using both isotope methods. No significant differences in seasonal trophic magnification slope (TMS), the slope of the linear regression, in- and between methods were found. However, [THg] baseline estimates, the intercept of the linear regression, were significantly different between methods when comparing the same seasons. [THg] baseline values were generally higher in all seasons in bulk δ<sup>15</sup>N than CSIA-AA. Results highlight relatively stable biomagnification among seasons in both methods, however, direct comparisons of bulk δ<sup>15</sup>N and CSIA-AA TLs require further methodological development.

Environmental PollutionVol. 372
University of Helsinki (FI), ASM International (Finland) (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Opetushallitus, Maa- ja Vesitekniikan Tuki Ry, Hämeen Rahasto
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.