Biodiversity monitoring in remote marine environments: Advancing environmental DNA/RNA sampling workflows

Understanding biodiversity is crucial for protecting unique environments, but acquiring this knowledge is challenging in isolated areas due to limited availability of easy-to-implement biomonitoring tools. To determine optimal sampling strategies in remote regions, environmental DNA and RNA (eDNA and eRNA) sampling workflows were evaluated at 12 sites in three fiords within Fiordland National Park, Aotearoa-New Zealand. For filtration comparison, a modified cruising speed net was used to concentrate eDNA/eRNA onto 20 μm nylon filters, while water from the net's cod-end was filtered through a 5 μm Smith-Root self-preserving filter using the eDNA Citizen Scientist Sampler. To compare preservation methods, Smith-Root filters were cut in half, with one half preserved in the self-preserving unit and the other in DNA/RNA Shield™ buffer. Biodiversity screening was performed by sequencing the 18S rRNA gene for eukaryotes and two mitochondrial 16S rRNA genes for fish and marine vertebrates. Comparable amplicon sequence variant (ASVs) richness was observed between methods, yet samples preserved with buffer showed higher richness of fish and marine vertebrate taxa and higher PCR amplification success. There was little variation in community composition, except for 16S rRNA targeting fish, where distinct patterns emerged based on preservation methods. Overall, sampling workflows showed similar community composition and alpha diversity across both nucleic acids. These results confirm that enhancing eDNA/eRNA yields for sparse taxa requires consideration of collection and preservation methods. However, abundant taxa biodiversity is captured consistently, allowing for adjustments without compromising robustness. These insights support streamlined eDNA/eRNA sampling, emphasizing adaptive strategies based on targeted taxa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Environmental Research
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107041
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity monitoring in remote marine environments: Advancing environmental DNA/RNA sampling workflows

Austen C. Thomas, Olga Belonovich, Jo‐Ann L. Stanton, Xavier Pochon et al.
4 citations
Marine Environmental Research
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
article

Biodiversity monitoring in remote marine environments: Advancing environmental DNA/RNA sampling workflows

Austen C. Thomas, Olga Belonovich, Jo‐Ann L. Stanton, Xavier Pochon, Anastasija Zaiko, Gert‐Jan Jeunen, Neil J. Gemmell, Ulla von Ammon, Michelle Scriver
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Understanding biodiversity is crucial for protecting unique environments, but acquiring this knowledge is challenging in isolated areas due to limited availability of easy-to-implement biomonitoring tools. To determine optimal sampling strategies in remote regions, environmental DNA and RNA (eDNA and eRNA) sampling workflows were evaluated at 12 sites in three fiords within Fiordland National Park, Aotearoa-New Zealand. For filtration comparison, a modified cruising speed net was used to concentrate eDNA/eRNA onto 20 μm nylon filters, while water from the net's cod-end was filtered through a 5 μm Smith-Root self-preserving filter using the eDNA Citizen Scientist Sampler. To compare preservation methods, Smith-Root filters were cut in half, with one half preserved in the self-preserving unit and the other in DNA/RNA Shield™ buffer. Biodiversity screening was performed by sequencing the 18S rRNA gene for eukaryotes and two mitochondrial 16S rRNA genes for fish and marine vertebrates. Comparable amplicon sequence variant (ASVs) richness was observed between methods, yet samples preserved with buffer showed higher richness of fish and marine vertebrate taxa and higher PCR amplification success. There was little variation in community composition, except for 16S rRNA targeting fish, where distinct patterns emerged based on preservation methods. Overall, sampling workflows showed similar community composition and alpha diversity across both nucleic acids. These results confirm that enhancing eDNA/eRNA yields for sparse taxa requires consideration of collection and preservation methods. However, abundant taxa biodiversity is captured consistently, allowing for adjustments without compromising robustness. These insights support streamlined eDNA/eRNA sampling, emphasizing adaptive strategies based on targeted taxa.

Marine Environmental ResearchVol. 206
Smith-Root (United States) (US), Cawthron Institute (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.