The 1-Step Versus 2-Step Subretinal Injection Trial (1,2-SIT)—A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Drug Reflux Following Subretinal Injection

This study demonstrates that drug loss following SRI ranged from 0.4% to 19.8% (mean 4.3%). There is no significant difference between 1-step and 2-step SRI in the mean proportion of drug reflux, duration of surgery, change in neural retinal thickness, or change in BCVA. However, there is a significantly greater variability in reflux for 1-step injection compared to 2-step injection. AAV yields are not affected by 0.1 mg/mL sodium fluorescein, nor is RPC viability. These data suggest that sodium fluorescein may be an appropriate means of tracking subretinal AAV gene therapy and retinal cell therapy quantitatively and that the 2-step SRI approach is preferable to 1-step SRI to ensure consistency in drug delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.02.018
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 1-Step Versus 2-Step Subretinal Injection Trial (1,2-SIT)—A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Drug Reflux Following Subretinal Injection

Zak Prime, Perach Osaadon, Matthew P. Simunovic, Tun Hang Yeo et al.
3 citations
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
5.12
article

The 1-Step Versus 2-Step Subretinal Injection Trial (1,2-SIT)—A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Drug Reflux Following Subretinal Injection

Zak Prime, Perach Osaadon, Matthew P. Simunovic, Tun Hang Yeo, Khin Thida Oo, Zeid Madanat, Lay Khoon Too, Rhuen Chiou Chow, Emily H. Shao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study demonstrates that drug loss following SRI ranged from 0.4% to 19.8% (mean 4.3%). There is no significant difference between 1-step and 2-step SRI in the mean proportion of drug reflux, duration of surgery, change in neural retinal thickness, or change in BCVA. However, there is a significantly greater variability in reflux for 1-step injection compared to 2-step injection. AAV yields are not affected by 0.1 mg/mL sodium fluorescein, nor is RPC viability. These data suggest that sodium fluorescein may be an appropriate means of tracking subretinal AAV gene therapy and retinal cell therapy quantitatively and that the 2-step SRI approach is preferable to 1-step SRI to ensure consistency in drug delivery.

American Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 274
Sydney Hospital (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Foundation Fighting Blindness, Foundation Fighting Blindness
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
5.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The 1-Step Versus 2-Step Subretinal Injection Trial (1,2-SIT)—A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Drug Reflux Following Subretinal Injection — Zak Prime, Perach Osaadon, et al. · American Journal of Ophthalmology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS