Industrial Secret Transfer via Smart Contracts: Addressing Arrow's Information Paradox

In the current state of the art, systems exist for the transfer of intangibleassets protected by Intellectual Property, consolidated through legal monopolies, either by attributive systems (such as patents and industrial designs) or automatically protected (such as copyrights andrelated rights). Some of these systems, or their respective methods, are described in scientific literature. Among these, some methods use blockchain technology, and a smaller subset (entirely contained within the former) also uses smart contract technology, though these areindependent tools. Although industrial secrets also constitute monopolies, the computerized or cryptographic solutions applied to other types of assets protected by different forms of intellectual property cannot be applied to these assets due to their sui generis nature, lackinga monopoly that exists independently of their non-disclosure. The need to maintain secrecy arises from Arrow’s Information Paradox, a phenomenon in which revealing the secret implies its transfer. This phenomenon hinders the potential transfer of industrial secrets and makes it impossible to adopt existing systems applicable to other types of intangible assets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ciência da Informação
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v53i1.7340
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial Secret Transfer via Smart Contracts: Addressing Arrow's Information Paradox

Felipe Octaviano Delgado Busnello, �. Schuler, Anderson Ricardo Yanzer Cabra
Ciência da Informação
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Industrial Secret Transfer via Smart Contracts: Addressing Arrow's Information Paradox

Felipe Octaviano Delgado Busnello, �. Schuler, Anderson Ricardo Yanzer Cabra
article en

Abstract

In the current state of the art, systems exist for the transfer of intangibleassets protected by Intellectual Property, consolidated through legal monopolies, either by attributive systems (such as patents and industrial designs) or automatically protected (such as copyrights andrelated rights). Some of these systems, or their respective methods, are described in scientific literature. Among these, some methods use blockchain technology, and a smaller subset (entirely contained within the former) also uses smart contract technology, though these areindependent tools. Although industrial secrets also constitute monopolies, the computerized or cryptographic solutions applied to other types of assets protected by different forms of intellectual property cannot be applied to these assets due to their sui generis nature, lackinga monopoly that exists independently of their non-disclosure. The need to maintain secrecy arises from Arrow’s Information Paradox, a phenomenon in which revealing the secret implies its transfer. This phenomenon hinders the potential transfer of industrial secrets and makes it impossible to adopt existing systems applicable to other types of intangible assets.

Ciência da InformaçãoVol. 53
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.