PRIVACY MODELS AND ANONYMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR TABULAR HEALTHCARE DATA

In today's world, issues of privacy and personal data protection are becoming extremely relevant, especially in the healthcare field, where the use of large volumes of data for research is becoming increasingly common. The use of personal data is regulated by relevant laws that require data anonymization to minimize the risks of identifying individuals. Anonymization is a process that allows the use of sensitive data without the risk of disclosing personal information while maintaining its utility. This article discusses the main privacy models and anonymization techniques used to protect tabular healthcare data. Privacy models include k-anonymity, l-diversity, and t-closeness. The k-anonymity model ensures that any combination of quasi-identifiers is shared by at least k records. The l-diversity model complements k-anonymity by requiring at least l unique combinations of sensitive attribute (SA) values in each equivalence class. The t-closeness model considers the distribution of these sensitive attribute values, ensuring that the distance between the SA distribution in the equivalence class and the overall distribution does not exceed a specified threshold. Anonymization techniques include generalization, suppression, relocation, permutation, perturbation, slicing, differential privacy, and synthetic data. Generalization reduces the precision of quasi-identifiers. Suppression removes certain values from the dataset to improve its statistical characteristics. Relocation changes a limited number of values in the data to enhance protection. Permutation mixes the values of quasi-identifiers between records while preserving the overall statistical features of the dataset. Perturbation adds noise to the data, increasing privacy. The idea of differential privacy also involves adding noise, but this is done at the query processing stage. Generating synthetic data allows the creation of new datasets that are similar in characteristics to the original data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of National Technical University KhPI Series System Analysis Control and Information Technologies
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2024.02.12
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRIVACY MODELS AND ANONYMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR TABULAR HEALTHCARE DATA

Valeriy Petrovich Severin, Denys Kalinin, Mykola Bezmenov
Bulletin of National Technical University KhPI Series System Analysis Control and Information Technologies
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

PRIVACY MODELS AND ANONYMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR TABULAR HEALTHCARE DATA

Valeriy Petrovich Severin, Denys Kalinin, Mykola Bezmenov
article en

Abstract

In today's world, issues of privacy and personal data protection are becoming extremely relevant, especially in the healthcare field, where the use of large volumes of data for research is becoming increasingly common. The use of personal data is regulated by relevant laws that require data anonymization to minimize the risks of identifying individuals. Anonymization is a process that allows the use of sensitive data without the risk of disclosing personal information while maintaining its utility. This article discusses the main privacy models and anonymization techniques used to protect tabular healthcare data. Privacy models include k-anonymity, l-diversity, and t-closeness. The k-anonymity model ensures that any combination of quasi-identifiers is shared by at least k records. The l-diversity model complements k-anonymity by requiring at least l unique combinations of sensitive attribute (SA) values in each equivalence class. The t-closeness model considers the distribution of these sensitive attribute values, ensuring that the distance between the SA distribution in the equivalence class and the overall distribution does not exceed a specified threshold. Anonymization techniques include generalization, suppression, relocation, permutation, perturbation, slicing, differential privacy, and synthetic data. Generalization reduces the precision of quasi-identifiers. Suppression removes certain values from the dataset to improve its statistical characteristics. Relocation changes a limited number of values in the data to enhance protection. Permutation mixes the values of quasi-identifiers between records while preserving the overall statistical features of the dataset. Perturbation adds noise to the data, increasing privacy. The idea of differential privacy also involves adding noise, but this is done at the query processing stage. Generating synthetic data allows the creation of new datasets that are similar in characteristics to the original data.

Bulletin of National Technical University KhPI Series System Analysis Control and Information Technologies(2 (12))
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PRIVACY MODELS AND ANONYMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR TABULAR HEALTHCARE DATA — Valeriy Petrovich Severin, Denys Kalinin, et al. · Bulletin of National Technical University KhPI Series System Analysis Control and Information Technologies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS