The face of illusory truth: Repetition of information elicits affective facial reactions predicting judgments of truth

People tend to judge repeated information as more likely true compared with new information. A key explanation for this phenomenon, called the illusory truth effect, is that repeated information can be processed more fluently, causing it to appear more familiar and trustworthy. To consider the function of time in investigating its underlying cognitive and affective mechanisms, our design comprised two retention intervals. Seventy-five participants rated the truth of new and repeated statements 10 min, as well as 1 week after first exposure while spontaneous facial expressions were assessed via electromyography. Our data demonstrate that repetition results not only in an increased probability of judging information as true (illusory truth effect) but also in specific facial reactions indicating increased positive affect, reduced mental effort, and increased familiarity (i.e., relaxations of musculus corrugator supercilii and frontalis) during the evaluation of information. The results moreover highlight the relevance of time: both the repetition-induced truth effect as well as EMG activities, indicating increased positive affect and reduced mental effort, decrease significantly after a longer interval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01266-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The face of illusory truth: Repetition of information elicits affective facial reactions predicting judgments of truth

Jeffrey N. Rouder, Torsten Wüstenberg, Annika Stump, Andreas Voß
1 citations
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
article

The face of illusory truth: Repetition of information elicits affective facial reactions predicting judgments of truth

Jeffrey N. Rouder, Torsten Wüstenberg, Annika Stump, Andreas Voß
article en
1 citations

Abstract

People tend to judge repeated information as more likely true compared with new information. A key explanation for this phenomenon, called the illusory truth effect, is that repeated information can be processed more fluently, causing it to appear more familiar and trustworthy. To consider the function of time in investigating its underlying cognitive and affective mechanisms, our design comprised two retention intervals. Seventy-five participants rated the truth of new and repeated statements 10 min, as well as 1 week after first exposure while spontaneous facial expressions were assessed via electromyography. Our data demonstrate that repetition results not only in an increased probability of judging information as true (illusory truth effect) but also in specific facial reactions indicating increased positive affect, reduced mental effort, and increased familiarity (i.e., relaxations of musculus corrugator supercilii and frontalis) during the evaluation of information. The results moreover highlight the relevance of time: both the repetition-induced truth effect as well as EMG activities, indicating increased positive affect and reduced mental effort, decrease significantly after a longer interval.

Cognitive Affective & Behavioral NeuroscienceVol. 25(3)
University of Freiburg (DE), University of California, Irvine (US), Heidelberg University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.