Participation in SoHO and ATMP public consultations: a fragmented institutional landscape

Abstract In the European Union (EU), the recent adoption of the Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) Regulation in June 2024 brings into force new harmonised rules for human cells, tissues and blood. This legislation interacts with the pre-existing Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) Regulation. This paper looks at the recent EU public consultations on the proposed SoHO Regulation and compares them with the prior consultations on the ATMP Regulation given the interplay between these two Acts. Information on each contributor to the three most recent consultations on SoHO and the two available consultations on the ATMP was collected, analysed, and used to develop a novel typology of entities participating in the consultations. This data set included the country of origin of each entity making a contribution and the type of entity involved (Academic/Research institutions, National Bodies, Companies, Business organizations, Patient and Consumer organizations, Learned Societies, Individual citizens, Networks/Innovation organizations, and Other Non-Governmental Organizations). The results show that the SoHO consultations attracted a far greater total volume of participants and displayed a greater variety of organizations from more distinct countries compared to the ATMP consultations. The most significant finding is the very low overlap in organisations making a contribution to both a SoHO and an ATMP consultations. This strongly suggests that there is significant institutional fragmentation between organisations collecting human biomaterials and organisations developing ATMP for market. Given that collection of biomaterials is a necessary first step in the development of most ATMP, European policy makers wishing to support ‘homegrown’ innovation with ATMP should give greater consideration to building better links between organisations collecting biomaterials and ATMP developers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04552-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participation in SoHO and ATMP public consultations: a fragmented institutional landscape

Michael Morrison, Valentin Brunel, Aurélie Mahalatchimy
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
article

Participation in SoHO and ATMP public consultations: a fragmented institutional landscape

Michael Morrison, Valentin Brunel, Aurélie Mahalatchimy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the European Union (EU), the recent adoption of the Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) Regulation in June 2024 brings into force new harmonised rules for human cells, tissues and blood. This legislation interacts with the pre-existing Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) Regulation. This paper looks at the recent EU public consultations on the proposed SoHO Regulation and compares them with the prior consultations on the ATMP Regulation given the interplay between these two Acts. Information on each contributor to the three most recent consultations on SoHO and the two available consultations on the ATMP was collected, analysed, and used to develop a novel typology of entities participating in the consultations. This data set included the country of origin of each entity making a contribution and the type of entity involved (Academic/Research institutions, National Bodies, Companies, Business organizations, Patient and Consumer organizations, Learned Societies, Individual citizens, Networks/Innovation organizations, and Other Non-Governmental Organizations). The results show that the SoHO consultations attracted a far greater total volume of participants and displayed a greater variety of organizations from more distinct countries compared to the ATMP consultations. The most significant finding is the very low overlap in organisations making a contribution to both a SoHO and an ATMP consultations. This strongly suggests that there is significant institutional fragmentation between organisations collecting human biomaterials and organisations developing ATMP for market. Given that collection of biomaterials is a necessary first step in the development of most ATMP, European policy makers wishing to support ‘homegrown’ innovation with ATMP should give greater consideration to building better links between organisations collecting biomaterials and ATMP developers.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (BJ), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), University of Oxford (GB), Centre de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement (FR), Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités Ange Guépin (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.