Harmonization of practice of release of patients after radiopharmaceutical therapy

The implementation of novel therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals requires developing, updating, and harmonizing requirements for radiation safety in radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Public exposure from patients with administered radiopharmaceuticals and biological radioactive waste management have been identified as the main problems in RPT. The aim of our study was to compare different approaches to the development of patient release criteria after RPT with different radiopharmaceuticals, considering radiation exposure of members of the public in transport, biological elimination of radionuclides from a patient's body, and the generation of biological waste. The study was performed for the following radiopharmaceuticals:<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617,<sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE, Na<sup>131</sup>I,<sup>131</sup>I-mIBG, and<sup>153</sup>Sm-oxabifor. Two base approaches to patient release criteria were considered. The first approach is based on the radioactive decay of radionuclides and is divided into two groups: considering one radiopharmaceutical administration and considering several radiopharmaceutical administrations per course. The second approach is based on the radioactive decay of radionuclides and biological elimination of radiopharmaceuticals from the patient's body (effective half-life) and is divided into groups based on 1 and 5 mSv dose constraints per course. The ffective dose rates from patients and sewage tanks to passengers and staff on public transport were estimated for various scenarios of patients traveling after RPT. The results demonstrated that the radiation safety of members of the public in transport should be considered when establishing the release criteria of patients after RPT. Based on the results, it is recommended to follow the approach based on the radioactive decay of radionuclides and dose constraints to members of the public in contact with patients of 1 mSv per radiopharmaceutical administration, and keep patients in the nuclear medicine department after radiopharmaceutical administration for at least 4-6 h. The patient release criteria defined according to this approach comply with patient release criteria used in different countries, and allow the radiation safety of the public to be maintained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiological Protection
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/adba70
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonization of practice of release of patients after radiopharmaceutical therapy

И. А. Звонова, D. N. Maystrenko, А. В. Водоватов, Л. А. Чипига et al.
2 citations
Journal of Radiological Protection
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
2.72
article

Harmonization of practice of release of patients after radiopharmaceutical therapy

И. А. Звонова, D. N. Maystrenko, А. В. Водоватов, Л. А. Чипига, Д. А. Важенина, A. A. Stanzhevskiy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The implementation of novel therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals requires developing, updating, and harmonizing requirements for radiation safety in radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Public exposure from patients with administered radiopharmaceuticals and biological radioactive waste management have been identified as the main problems in RPT. The aim of our study was to compare different approaches to the development of patient release criteria after RPT with different radiopharmaceuticals, considering radiation exposure of members of the public in transport, biological elimination of radionuclides from a patient's body, and the generation of biological waste. The study was performed for the following radiopharmaceuticals:<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617,<sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE, Na<sup>131</sup>I,<sup>131</sup>I-mIBG, and<sup>153</sup>Sm-oxabifor. Two base approaches to patient release criteria were considered. The first approach is based on the radioactive decay of radionuclides and is divided into two groups: considering one radiopharmaceutical administration and considering several radiopharmaceutical administrations per course. The second approach is based on the radioactive decay of radionuclides and biological elimination of radiopharmaceuticals from the patient's body (effective half-life) and is divided into groups based on 1 and 5 mSv dose constraints per course. The ffective dose rates from patients and sewage tanks to passengers and staff on public transport were estimated for various scenarios of patients traveling after RPT. The results demonstrated that the radiation safety of members of the public in transport should be considered when establishing the release criteria of patients after RPT. Based on the results, it is recommended to follow the approach based on the radioactive decay of radionuclides and dose constraints to members of the public in contact with patients of 1 mSv per radiopharmaceutical administration, and keep patients in the nuclear medicine department after radiopharmaceutical administration for at least 4-6 h. The patient release criteria defined according to this approach comply with patient release criteria used in different countries, and allow the radiation safety of the public to be maintained.

Journal of Radiological ProtectionVol. 45(1)
Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU), City Hospital No. 40 (RU), St. Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies (RU), Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (RU), Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University (RU)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.