Reseeding restoration significantly improves the physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland soil in China—a meta-analysis

• Reseeding increases the carbon storage ability of degraded grassland in China. • Reseeding has the optimal remedial impact on surface soil. • The restorative effect increases with the degree of deterioration of grasslands. • Short-term reseeding does not significantly improve the quality of soil. Reseeding is widely used to restore degraded grasslands, given its efficiency in yielding a rapid restoration rate and high grassland output. Previous reseeding studies lacked integrated analysis to evaluate the restoration effect of reseeding on degraded grassland. We assessed the impact of reseeding on the restoration of degraded grassland and the influencing factors. Reseeding improved soil physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland, reducing soil bulk density (BD) (−2.18 %) and pH (−3.69 %), while increasing total nitrogen (TN) (11.74 %), total phosphorus (TP) (7.67 %), total potassium (TK) (2.40 %), and water content in soil (WC) (24.62 %). There was also an increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) content (17.94 %), promoting the conversion of degraded grasslands from carbon sources to carbon sinks. Reseeding had the highest and lowest restoration effects on typical grasslands and the Qinghai − Tibet Plateau (QTP). Reseeding significantly increased the WC (64.39 %), SOC (90.54 %), TN (42.50 %), and TP (11.43 %) content in typical grassland soil and reduced BD (−15.21 %). In contrast, reseeding only significantly increased the available potassium (AK) (19.85 %) content of QTP and reduced the soil pH (−2.94 %). Reseeding offered the most effective restoration for surface soil but did not considerably affect deep soil. The restorative impact of reseeding increased with the extent of grassland degradation. Medium- and long-term reseeding had the most significant restoration impact on WC (34.35 % and 65.15 %), TN (27.05 % and 20.47 %), and TP (12.76 % and 16.02 %). We provide new insights into restoring different grasslands with varying degrees of degradation and help with subsequent degraded grassland management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108849
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reseeding restoration significantly improves the physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland soil in China—a meta-analysis

Haixuan Zhang, Wentao Mi, Hao Zheng, Yaling Liu et al.
7 citations
CATENA
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
8.30
article

Reseeding restoration significantly improves the physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland soil in China—a meta-analysis

Haixuan Zhang, Wentao Mi, Hao Zheng, Yaling Liu, Feng Yuan, Wanyu Zhang, Weibo Ren, Yuan Chi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Reseeding increases the carbon storage ability of degraded grassland in China. • Reseeding has the optimal remedial impact on surface soil. • The restorative effect increases with the degree of deterioration of grasslands. • Short-term reseeding does not significantly improve the quality of soil. Reseeding is widely used to restore degraded grasslands, given its efficiency in yielding a rapid restoration rate and high grassland output. Previous reseeding studies lacked integrated analysis to evaluate the restoration effect of reseeding on degraded grassland. We assessed the impact of reseeding on the restoration of degraded grassland and the influencing factors. Reseeding improved soil physical and chemical properties of degraded grassland, reducing soil bulk density (BD) (−2.18 %) and pH (−3.69 %), while increasing total nitrogen (TN) (11.74 %), total phosphorus (TP) (7.67 %), total potassium (TK) (2.40 %), and water content in soil (WC) (24.62 %). There was also an increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) content (17.94 %), promoting the conversion of degraded grasslands from carbon sources to carbon sinks. Reseeding had the highest and lowest restoration effects on typical grasslands and the Qinghai − Tibet Plateau (QTP). Reseeding significantly increased the WC (64.39 %), SOC (90.54 %), TN (42.50 %), and TP (11.43 %) content in typical grassland soil and reduced BD (−15.21 %). In contrast, reseeding only significantly increased the available potassium (AK) (19.85 %) content of QTP and reduced the soil pH (−2.94 %). Reseeding offered the most effective restoration for surface soil but did not considerably affect deep soil. The restorative impact of reseeding increased with the extent of grassland degradation. Medium- and long-term reseeding had the most significant restoration impact on WC (34.35 % and 65.15 %), TN (27.05 % and 20.47 %), and TP (12.76 % and 16.02 %). We provide new insights into restoring different grasslands with varying degrees of degradation and help with subsequent degraded grassland management.

CATENAVol. 252
Inner Mongolia University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
8.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.