Non-cooperative and cooperative environmental R&D risk choices under environmental corporate social responsibility guidelines

This study investigates environmental R&D (ER&D) risk choice by polluting duopoly firms under environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) guideline. We show that the ER&D risk level under cooperative ER&D is always higher than under non-cooperative ER&D, resulting in a higher expected consumer surplus and lower expected environmental damage. We also demonstrate that the firm's expected profit depends on the level of ECSR while a firm's expected value under cooperative ER&D is higher than that under non-cooperative ER&D, which creates a conflict of interest between the shareholders' expected private value and the stakeholders' expected public value. Our analysis suggests that the government should appropriately align ECSR guideline in accordance with emission tax rate, by considering firms' coordination of cooperative or non-cooperative ER&D activities on their risk choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation and Green Development
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100208
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-cooperative and cooperative environmental R&D risk choices under environmental corporate social responsibility guidelines

Mingqing Xing, Sang‐Ho Lee
4 citations
Innovation and Green Development
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
article

Non-cooperative and cooperative environmental R&D risk choices under environmental corporate social responsibility guidelines

Mingqing Xing, Sang‐Ho Lee
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study investigates environmental R&D (ER&D) risk choice by polluting duopoly firms under environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) guideline. We show that the ER&D risk level under cooperative ER&D is always higher than under non-cooperative ER&D, resulting in a higher expected consumer surplus and lower expected environmental damage. We also demonstrate that the firm's expected profit depends on the level of ECSR while a firm's expected value under cooperative ER&D is higher than that under non-cooperative ER&D, which creates a conflict of interest between the shareholders' expected private value and the stakeholders' expected public value. Our analysis suggests that the government should appropriately align ECSR guideline in accordance with emission tax rate, by considering firms' coordination of cooperative or non-cooperative ER&D activities on their risk choices.

Innovation and Green DevelopmentVol. 4(2)
Chonnam National University (KR), Weifang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.