Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Detection of Breast Cancer Lymph Node Metastases in the Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Setting

Lymph node assessment for metastasis is a common, time-consuming, and potentially error-prone pathologist task. Past studies have proposed deep learning algorithms designed to automate this task. However, none have explicitly evaluated the generalizability of these algorithms to lymph node in patients with breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT). In this study, we created a large 1027-slide data set exclusively containing patients with breast cancer who have received NAT with detailed pathologist labels. We developed an interpretable deep learning pipeline to carry out the following 2 tasks: first, to classify slides as positive or negative for metastases, and second, to create a detailed, patch-level heatmap for probability of metastasis. We evaluated this pipeline with and without post-NAT treatment effect in training data, and investigated its performance relative to both slide- and patch-level tasks. We found that the presence of post-NAT treatment effect training data is relevant for both tasks, with particular benefits in pipeline specificity. With the post-NAT testing cohort, we found that our final pipeline obtained 0.986 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for slide-level classification, and 70.9% specificity when calibrating for 100% sensitivity. We additionally performed an interpretability study on the outputs of our pipeline and found that the patch-level heatmap was successful in efficiently guiding pathologists toward detecting and correcting erroneous predictions that were made with an uncalibrated network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Investigation
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104121
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Detection of Breast Cancer Lymph Node Metastases in the Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Setting

Anne L. Martel, Sharon Nofech‐Mozes, Tony Xu, Maged Goubran et al.
1 citations
Laboratory Investigation
AI in cancer detection
2.48
article

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Detection of Breast Cancer Lymph Node Metastases in the Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Setting

Anne L. Martel, Sharon Nofech‐Mozes, Tony Xu, Maged Goubran, Chetan L. Srinidhi, Dina Bassiouny, Martin H. C. Lam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lymph node assessment for metastasis is a common, time-consuming, and potentially error-prone pathologist task. Past studies have proposed deep learning algorithms designed to automate this task. However, none have explicitly evaluated the generalizability of these algorithms to lymph node in patients with breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT). In this study, we created a large 1027-slide data set exclusively containing patients with breast cancer who have received NAT with detailed pathologist labels. We developed an interpretable deep learning pipeline to carry out the following 2 tasks: first, to classify slides as positive or negative for metastases, and second, to create a detailed, patch-level heatmap for probability of metastasis. We evaluated this pipeline with and without post-NAT treatment effect in training data, and investigated its performance relative to both slide- and patch-level tasks. We found that the presence of post-NAT treatment effect training data is relevant for both tasks, with particular benefits in pipeline specificity. With the post-NAT testing cohort, we found that our final pipeline obtained 0.986 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for slide-level classification, and 70.9% specificity when calibrating for 100% sensitivity. We additionally performed an interpretability study on the outputs of our pipeline and found that the patch-level heatmap was successful in efficiently guiding pathologists toward detecting and correcting erroneous predictions that were made with an uncalibrated network.

Laboratory InvestigationVol. 105(6)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Sunnybrook Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Research Institute
Ontario Research Foundation, Canadian Cancer Society, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canadian Cancer Society, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
AI in cancer detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.