Statistical analyses of sunscreen usage survey data for the purpose of factor refinement influencing UV filter exposure in aquatic systems

• Sunscreen use survey data can be used to improve aquatic risk assessments of UV filters. • One-size-approach to risk assessments of UV filters in sunscreens is inappropriate. • Several factors play a significant role in assessing sunscreen application thickness. • GLMs improve findings associated with UV filter emissions in risk assessments. • Study can be used to improve future survey design and data analysis of sunscreens. Current environmental emissions assessments for UV filters in sunscreens used at the beach assume a uniform application rate. While this approach is both conservative and pragmatic, it fails to take into account consumer behaviors that could lead to a range of application values. This study explored diverse behavior, environmental, and other independent factors that may affect application rates by investigating results from an online survey with >2,000 participants. The survey included visual references that helped participants determine the mass of sunscreen lotion applied to their face and body. The resulting datasets for the face and body required curation to eliminate conflicting responses (e.g., “I don't typically apply sunscreen” and contradictory sunscreen application amount responses). Environmental variables tied to the zip codes of participants were investigated for their links with application rates. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess the multivariate nature of participant attributes (e.g., income, skin tone), environmental factors (e.g., UV radiation by zip code) and others to self-report application rates. Akaike's Information Criterion was used to select highly significant models. An eight-variable model explained application thickness on the body, in order of statistical significance: amount of body submerged in water, time in water, gender identity, age, Fitzpatrick skin type, body reapplication, skin response to the sun, and time at the beach. The statistical analysis demonstrated that a clear, one-size-approach toward exposure assessment of UV filters in sunscreens at the beach may not be appropriate because several independent variables were significantly related to application rates to the face and body. The learnings from this study can be used to refine future online surveys. This can lead to realistic environmental emissions and exposure assessments that include diverse independent factors associated with sunscreen use at the beach as well as the ability to tailor emissions estimates to specific beach and aquatic environments thus providing the ability to better target environmental risk management actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101112
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical analyses of sunscreen usage survey data for the purpose of factor refinement influencing UV filter exposure in aquatic systems

Andrea M. Carrao, Celine N. Schmitt, Scott D. Dyer, Sarah L. Terrell
Environmental Challenges
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Statistical analyses of sunscreen usage survey data for the purpose of factor refinement influencing UV filter exposure in aquatic systems

Andrea M. Carrao, Celine N. Schmitt, Scott D. Dyer, Sarah L. Terrell
article en

Abstract

• Sunscreen use survey data can be used to improve aquatic risk assessments of UV filters. • One-size-approach to risk assessments of UV filters in sunscreens is inappropriate. • Several factors play a significant role in assessing sunscreen application thickness. • GLMs improve findings associated with UV filter emissions in risk assessments. • Study can be used to improve future survey design and data analysis of sunscreens. Current environmental emissions assessments for UV filters in sunscreens used at the beach assume a uniform application rate. While this approach is both conservative and pragmatic, it fails to take into account consumer behaviors that could lead to a range of application values. This study explored diverse behavior, environmental, and other independent factors that may affect application rates by investigating results from an online survey with >2,000 participants. The survey included visual references that helped participants determine the mass of sunscreen lotion applied to their face and body. The resulting datasets for the face and body required curation to eliminate conflicting responses (e.g., “I don't typically apply sunscreen” and contradictory sunscreen application amount responses). Environmental variables tied to the zip codes of participants were investigated for their links with application rates. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess the multivariate nature of participant attributes (e.g., income, skin tone), environmental factors (e.g., UV radiation by zip code) and others to self-report application rates. Akaike's Information Criterion was used to select highly significant models. An eight-variable model explained application thickness on the body, in order of statistical significance: amount of body submerged in water, time in water, gender identity, age, Fitzpatrick skin type, body reapplication, skin response to the sun, and time at the beach. The statistical analysis demonstrated that a clear, one-size-approach toward exposure assessment of UV filters in sunscreens at the beach may not be appropriate because several independent variables were significantly related to application rates to the face and body. The learnings from this study can be used to refine future online surveys. This can lead to realistic environmental emissions and exposure assessments that include diverse independent factors associated with sunscreen use at the beach as well as the ability to tailor emissions estimates to specific beach and aquatic environments thus providing the ability to better target environmental risk management actions.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 19
LeTourneau University (US), Waterborne Environmental (United States) (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.