Anthropogenic mortality risk of lions depends on a combination of environmental, climatic, and cultural factors within a Sub-Saharan African ecosystem

Human-caused mortality is a major cause of decline for large carnivore populations worldwide. Here we use a long-term data compiled from 1980 to 2018 to highlight the possible linkages between conflict-related mortality of lions ( Panthera leo ) and diverse socioecological factors in the Greater Etosha Landscape (GEL) surrounding Etosha National Park (ENP) in northwestern Namibia. We also use conflict-related mortality records (2001–2018) to model the spatial risk of fatality for lions from anthropogenic mortality, identify the major predictors of mortality, and map potential hotspots of anthropogenic mortality across the GEL. There were 698 conflict related lion mortalities reported between 1980 and 2018 with an average annual mortality of 22 lions (SE 16), although these are likely underestimates as not all anthropogenic mortality may have been reported. Conflict-related anthropogenic mortality of lions peaked during the cold dry season when availability of water was limited and game movements were concentrated around perennial waterpoints, and was greater in areas with localized livestock populations and low woody cover. Our landscape risk analysis revealed that areas bordering ENP function as ecological traps with certain pockets within the GEL acting as hotspots of conflict-related mortality. The majority of the conflict-related lion mortality was reported from commercial freehold farms reflecting Namibia’s colonial history and land ownership. Our findings suggest that mitigation measures to reduce human-lion conflict at the interface of ENP and other protected areas in Sub-Saharan Africa need to consider both ecological and cultural factors to have maximal impact. Given the high conflict-related mortality of lions in the landscape surrounding ENP, a conservation management strategy is critically needed to ensure human-lion coexistence within the GEL. • Anthropogenic mortality of lions peaked during the cold dry season in the Greater Etosha Landscape. • Interactions between ecological, climatic, and cultural factors influence human-lion conflicts. • Livestock density, woody cover, and land management type determine spatial risk of anthropogenic lion mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03514
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropogenic mortality risk of lions depends on a combination of environmental, climatic, and cultural factors within a Sub-Saharan African ecosystem

J. Werner Kilian, James C. Beasley, Claudine Cloete, Claire E. Goelst et al.
2 citations
Global Ecology and Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
3.43
article

Anthropogenic mortality risk of lions depends on a combination of environmental, climatic, and cultural factors within a Sub-Saharan African ecosystem

J. Werner Kilian, James C. Beasley, Claudine Cloete, Claire E. Goelst, Dipanjan Naha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Human-caused mortality is a major cause of decline for large carnivore populations worldwide. Here we use a long-term data compiled from 1980 to 2018 to highlight the possible linkages between conflict-related mortality of lions ( Panthera leo ) and diverse socioecological factors in the Greater Etosha Landscape (GEL) surrounding Etosha National Park (ENP) in northwestern Namibia. We also use conflict-related mortality records (2001–2018) to model the spatial risk of fatality for lions from anthropogenic mortality, identify the major predictors of mortality, and map potential hotspots of anthropogenic mortality across the GEL. There were 698 conflict related lion mortalities reported between 1980 and 2018 with an average annual mortality of 22 lions (SE 16), although these are likely underestimates as not all anthropogenic mortality may have been reported. Conflict-related anthropogenic mortality of lions peaked during the cold dry season when availability of water was limited and game movements were concentrated around perennial waterpoints, and was greater in areas with localized livestock populations and low woody cover. Our landscape risk analysis revealed that areas bordering ENP function as ecological traps with certain pockets within the GEL acting as hotspots of conflict-related mortality. The majority of the conflict-related lion mortality was reported from commercial freehold farms reflecting Namibia’s colonial history and land ownership. Our findings suggest that mitigation measures to reduce human-lion conflict at the interface of ENP and other protected areas in Sub-Saharan Africa need to consider both ecological and cultural factors to have maximal impact. Given the high conflict-related mortality of lions in the landscape surrounding ENP, a conservation management strategy is critically needed to ensure human-lion coexistence within the GEL. • Anthropogenic mortality of lions peaked during the cold dry season in the Greater Etosha Landscape. • Interactions between ecological, climatic, and cultural factors influence human-lion conflicts. • Livestock density, woody cover, and land management type determine spatial risk of anthropogenic lion mortality.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 59
University of Georgia (US), Savannah River National Laboratory (US), Etosha Ecological Institute (NA), Columbia University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, University of Georgia, Office of Environmental Management, University of Georgia Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.