An Approach to Setting Vertebrate Animal-use Benchmarks for Agrochemical and GM Crop Testing to Facilitate Future Animal Reduction Efforts

Agrochemical active ingredients are among the most toxicologically evaluated chemical substances, and genetically modified (GM) crops must be evaluated for safety and nutritional adequacy. Traditionally, these evaluations are conducted <i>in vivo.</i> There are concerted efforts in the agrochemical sector to reduce animal testing, but there is also an emphasis on updating test guidelines and fulfilling new data package requirements, which can both result in increased animal testing. The purpose of this project was to generate benchmarks for the numbers of vertebrate animals used in: a) evaluating agrochemical pesticidal active ingredients for human health hazards; and b) assessing GM crops for safety and nutritional adequacy, based on guideline studies for data package requirements. To achieve this, guideline studies employing vertebrates, as required by regulatory bodies for developing global data packages for new active ingredients and for GM crops, were listed. These listed guideline studies were reviewed, in terms of the study details and the required animal-use, which was determined based on best testing practices. For historical animal-use benchmarking, Corteva's six most recent agrochemical pesticidal active ingredients and four most recent GM crop events were evaluated. Across the six most recently developed active ingredients, an average of approximately 10,000 mammals were used for the testing of each (range: 5500-19,000); across the four most recently developed GM crops, the average number of vertebrates similarly used for each was approximately 1200 (range: 1000-1500). Though regulatory testing requirements are likely to change with time, as new technologies become available, this project has established a theoretical minimum requirement to help drive aspirational animal reduction goals, identified regulatory challenges associated with the reduction of animal-use, and helped to refine Corteva's vertebrate animal-use tracking approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929251323270
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Approach to Setting Vertebrate Animal-use Benchmarks for Agrochemical and GM Crop Testing to Facilitate Future Animal Reduction Efforts

Joseph E. Henriquez, Lynea Murphy, Raja S. Settivari, Carey A. Mathesius et al.
1 citations
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
article

An Approach to Setting Vertebrate Animal-use Benchmarks for Agrochemical and GM Crop Testing to Facilitate Future Animal Reduction Efforts

Joseph E. Henriquez, Lynea Murphy, Raja S. Settivari, Carey A. Mathesius, Sean C. Gehen, Jessica LaRocca, Matthew Merrell, Susan Kisielewski, Kathleen Mikles
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Agrochemical active ingredients are among the most toxicologically evaluated chemical substances, and genetically modified (GM) crops must be evaluated for safety and nutritional adequacy. Traditionally, these evaluations are conducted <i>in vivo.</i> There are concerted efforts in the agrochemical sector to reduce animal testing, but there is also an emphasis on updating test guidelines and fulfilling new data package requirements, which can both result in increased animal testing. The purpose of this project was to generate benchmarks for the numbers of vertebrate animals used in: a) evaluating agrochemical pesticidal active ingredients for human health hazards; and b) assessing GM crops for safety and nutritional adequacy, based on guideline studies for data package requirements. To achieve this, guideline studies employing vertebrates, as required by regulatory bodies for developing global data packages for new active ingredients and for GM crops, were listed. These listed guideline studies were reviewed, in terms of the study details and the required animal-use, which was determined based on best testing practices. For historical animal-use benchmarking, Corteva's six most recent agrochemical pesticidal active ingredients and four most recent GM crop events were evaluated. Across the six most recently developed active ingredients, an average of approximately 10,000 mammals were used for the testing of each (range: 5500-19,000); across the four most recently developed GM crops, the average number of vertebrates similarly used for each was approximately 1200 (range: 1000-1500). Though regulatory testing requirements are likely to change with time, as new technologies become available, this project has established a theoretical minimum requirement to help drive aspirational animal reduction goals, identified regulatory challenges associated with the reduction of animal-use, and helped to refine Corteva's vertebrate animal-use tracking approaches.

Alternatives to Laboratory AnimalsVol. 53(2)
Corteva (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.