Authoritarian economic soft power: the case of Russian and Chinese investments in Central Europe

The paper deals with the economic soft power strategies of authoritarian countries in the Visegrad region: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Based on the material of authoritarian countries, state-owned enterprises and investments, economic soft power is necessary for the investment to be accepted and not perceived as a security issue. Based on empirical material, it concludes that even if the countries’ overall soft power ranking is low, they can overcome such an obstacle through cooperation with populist leaders. Even scaling down their presence for economic and non-economic reasons, Russia and China still leave the room for a return open, as the investment relies on a populist type of ruler, not a specific politician. It uses two case studies, one for Sputnik V as the economic soft power creation strategy and the case of CITIC departure for the scaling down presence strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Post-Communist Economies
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2025.2463039
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Russia and Soviet political economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authoritarian economic soft power: the case of Russian and Chinese investments in Central Europe

Karel Svoboda
2 citations
Post-Communist Economies
Russia and Soviet political economy
17.04
article

Authoritarian economic soft power: the case of Russian and Chinese investments in Central Europe

Karel Svoboda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The paper deals with the economic soft power strategies of authoritarian countries in the Visegrad region: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Based on the material of authoritarian countries, state-owned enterprises and investments, economic soft power is necessary for the investment to be accepted and not perceived as a security issue. Based on empirical material, it concludes that even if the countries’ overall soft power ranking is low, they can overcome such an obstacle through cooperation with populist leaders. Even scaling down their presence for economic and non-economic reasons, Russia and China still leave the room for a return open, as the investment relies on a populist type of ruler, not a specific politician. It uses two case studies, one for Sputnik V as the economic soft power creation strategy and the case of CITIC departure for the scaling down presence strategy.

Post-Communist EconomiesVol. 37(3)
Charles University (CZ)
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Russia and Soviet political economy
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.