Discrete Bayesian Dose-response Analysis under Dose Uncertainty

Establishing a relationship between disease and dose requires each individual in the population under investigation to be known by disease status and by the value of the dose received. Frequently, the dose values are reconstructed using a dose assessment model containing imprecisely known parameter values, model formulations, and input data (epistemic uncertainties). As a consequence, the state of knowledge of the assessed dose values needs to be expressed by a joint subjective probability distribution thereby accounting for state of knowledge dependence due to uncertainties shared by the assessed dose values of several individuals. Dose-response analysis must apply this joint state of knowledge in obtaining a subjective probability distribution for the parameters of the dose-response model. This is achieved by drawing a random sample of dose vectors according to the joint distribution, by applying Bayes' theorem for each vector, and by averaging the posterior parameter distributions (Bayesian model averaging). If the dose response is quantified by a binary variable, a logistic regression model is embedded in the likelihood function. This paper presents a new, computationally efficient Bayesian model averaging method that operates over the discretized parameter space and thereby does away with the computational complexities of Bayesian methods. It corrects for the attenuation effect that is due to the application of dose vectors other than the true vector. Results obtained for a sample of dose vectors are compared to those obtained with the standard discrete Bayesian method using the true dose vector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Physics
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0000000000001965
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrete Bayesian Dose-response Analysis under Dose Uncertainty

Ėduard Hofer
2 citations
Health Physics
Risk and Safety Analysis
2.80
article

Discrete Bayesian Dose-response Analysis under Dose Uncertainty

Ėduard Hofer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Establishing a relationship between disease and dose requires each individual in the population under investigation to be known by disease status and by the value of the dose received. Frequently, the dose values are reconstructed using a dose assessment model containing imprecisely known parameter values, model formulations, and input data (epistemic uncertainties). As a consequence, the state of knowledge of the assessed dose values needs to be expressed by a joint subjective probability distribution thereby accounting for state of knowledge dependence due to uncertainties shared by the assessed dose values of several individuals. Dose-response analysis must apply this joint state of knowledge in obtaining a subjective probability distribution for the parameters of the dose-response model. This is achieved by drawing a random sample of dose vectors according to the joint distribution, by applying Bayes' theorem for each vector, and by averaging the posterior parameter distributions (Bayesian model averaging). If the dose response is quantified by a binary variable, a logistic regression model is embedded in the likelihood function. This paper presents a new, computationally efficient Bayesian model averaging method that operates over the discretized parameter space and thereby does away with the computational complexities of Bayesian methods. It corrects for the attenuation effect that is due to the application of dose vectors other than the true vector. Results obtained for a sample of dose vectors are compared to those obtained with the standard discrete Bayesian method using the true dose vector.

Health PhysicsVol. 129(5)
Claremont Colleges (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Risk and Safety Analysis
2.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.