Nonfasting Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India versus Fasting Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus – Our Experience

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has a prevalence of as high as 20% in different countries of the world. The condition is being diagnosed using different screening methods and guidelines issued by various societies across the world. Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) test has been used in our country and is also part of the guidelines issued by the MOHFW. This comparative study was conducted to compare the DIPSI test with standard fasting 75 g 2-h OGTT (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group [IADPSG]) in the diagnosis of GDM. Materials and Methods: A comparative control trial was done at a tertiary care center involving 1000 women (500 in each group). The pregnant women were screened for GDM twice during the pregnancy at the first visit (<15 weeks pregnancy) to the ANC clinic and if required second screening was done at 24–28 weeks of pregnancy. The data were collected, and the results were analyzed using MS Excel. Results: The overall prevalence of GDM in our study was 21.4%. The prevalence of GDM in the DIPSI group was the same as GDM in women screened with IADPSG criteria. Conclusion: In our study, DIPSI and IADPSG criteria were found to be equally good in the diagnosis of GDM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_103_24
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonfasting Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India versus Fasting Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus – Our Experience

A.K. Agrawal, Sushil Chawla, Shankar Narayan
6 links
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Nonfasting Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India versus Fasting Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus – Our Experience

A.K. Agrawal, Sushil Chawla, Shankar Narayan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has a prevalence of as high as 20% in different countries of the world. The condition is being diagnosed using different screening methods and guidelines issued by various societies across the world. Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) test has been used in our country and is also part of the guidelines issued by the MOHFW. This comparative study was conducted to compare the DIPSI test with standard fasting 75 g 2-h OGTT (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group [IADPSG]) in the diagnosis of GDM. Materials and Methods: A comparative control trial was done at a tertiary care center involving 1000 women (500 in each group). The pregnant women were screened for GDM twice during the pregnancy at the first visit (<15 weeks pregnancy) to the ANC clinic and if required second screening was done at 24–28 weeks of pregnancy. The data were collected, and the results were analyzed using MS Excel. Results: The overall prevalence of GDM in our study was 21.4%. The prevalence of GDM in the DIPSI group was the same as GDM in women screened with IADPSG criteria. Conclusion: In our study, DIPSI and IADPSG criteria were found to be equally good in the diagnosis of GDM.

Journal of Marine Medical SocietyVol. 27(3)
Government Medical College (IN), INHS Asvini (IN), Army Hospital Research and Referral (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.