Risks of Relying on Artificial Intelligence in Learning Arabic Language Sciences Through the Meta Application

This study examines the risks of relying on artificial intelligence (AI) for learning Arabic language sciences. Many students and researchers increasingly use AI for linguistic study without recognizing its limitations. The research highlights these risks through descriptive, analytical, and applied approaches, testing the Meta application in grammar, morphology, orthography, prosody, semantics, and rhetoric. The study is structured into an introduction, a preface, and six sections. The preface defines AI, its development, characteristics, and the capabilities and shortcomings of the Meta application. Each chapter assesses AI’s performance in a specific linguistic field. Findings reveal that AI remains unable to provide fully accurate answers in Arabic studies due to the limited availability of Arabic linguistic data and the early stage of AI development. Additionally, Arabic’s inherent ambiguity contrasts with AI’s structured algorithmic approach, which relies on precision and clarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v7i1.2420
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Arabic Language Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risks of Relying on Artificial Intelligence in Learning Arabic Language Sciences Through the Meta Application

Abdullah Ali Hasan Al-Ghobesi
2 citations
Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies
Arabic Language Education Studies
17.85
article

Risks of Relying on Artificial Intelligence in Learning Arabic Language Sciences Through the Meta Application

Abdullah Ali Hasan Al-Ghobesi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the risks of relying on artificial intelligence (AI) for learning Arabic language sciences. Many students and researchers increasingly use AI for linguistic study without recognizing its limitations. The research highlights these risks through descriptive, analytical, and applied approaches, testing the Meta application in grammar, morphology, orthography, prosody, semantics, and rhetoric. The study is structured into an introduction, a preface, and six sections. The preface defines AI, its development, characteristics, and the capabilities and shortcomings of the Meta application. Each chapter assesses AI’s performance in a specific linguistic field. Findings reveal that AI remains unable to provide fully accurate answers in Arabic studies due to the limited availability of Arabic linguistic data and the early stage of AI development. Additionally, Arabic’s inherent ambiguity contrasts with AI’s structured algorithmic approach, which relies on precision and clarity.

Arts for Linguistic & Literary StudiesVol. 7(1)
Thamar University (YE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Arabic Language Education Studies
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.